IQQQ.DE vs. XMLC.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IQQQ.DE (iShares Global Water UCITS ETF) and XMLC.DE (L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF) are both Water Equities funds - IQQQ.DE tracks the S&P Global Water while XMLC.DE tracks the Solactive Clean Water. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IQQQ.DE returned 5.32%/yr vs 6.47%/yr for XMLC.DE. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IQQQ.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for XMLC.DE.

Performance

IQQQ.DE vs. XMLC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Global Water UCITS ETF (IQQQ.DE) and L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF (XMLC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQQQ.DE achieves a -0.71% return, which is significantly lower than XMLC.DE's 2.11% return.

IQQQ.DE

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: -3.72%
• YTD: -0.71%
• 6M: -1.42%
• 1Y: 1.94%
• 3Y*: 6.09%
• 5Y*: 5.32%
• 10Y*: 9.10%

XMLC.DE

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: -3.12%
• YTD: 2.11%
• 6M: 1.40%
• 1Y: 7.18%
• 3Y*: 8.21%
• 5Y*: 6.47%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQQQ.DE vs. XMLC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
IQQQ.DE iShares Global Water UCITS ETF	-0.71%	5.27%	10.22%	9.85%	-16.58%	42.81%	4.77%	11.73%
XMLC.DE L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF	2.11%	3.88%	9.96%	17.08%	-12.64%	37.15%	7.97%	11.56%

Correlation

The correlation between IQQQ.DE and XMLC.DE is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2019	0.90

The correlation between IQQQ.DE and XMLC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

IQQQ.DE vs. XMLC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQQQ.DE

IQQQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 11
IQQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
IQQQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
IQQQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 10
IQQQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
IQQQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 12

XMLC.DE

XMLC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 17
XMLC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
XMLC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
XMLC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 16
XMLC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
XMLC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQQQ.DE vs. XMLC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Water UCITS ETF (IQQQ.DE) and L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF (XMLC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IQQQ.DE	XMLC.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.15	0.48	-0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.28	0.77	-0.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.09	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.19	0.62	-0.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.49	1.60	-1.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IQQQ.DE vs. XMLC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the XMLC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQQQ.DE and XMLC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IQQQ.DE	XMLC.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15	0.48	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36	0.41	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.60	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.56	-0.07

Drawdowns

IQQQ.DE vs. XMLC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQQQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -48.04%, which is greater than XMLC.DE's maximum drawdown of -35.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQQ.DE and XMLC.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	IQQQ.DE	XMLC.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.04%	-35.25%	-12.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.94%	-11.02%	+2.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.50%	-19.51%	+2.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.39%	-20.54%	-3.85%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.50%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.97%	-7.57%	-0.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.76%	-6.31%	-1.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.51%	4.28%	-0.77%

Volatility

IQQQ.DE vs. XMLC.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Water UCITS ETF (IQQQ.DE) is 3.43%, while L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF (XMLC.DE) has a volatility of 4.03%. This indicates that IQQQ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMLC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IQQQ.DE	XMLC.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.43%	4.03%	-0.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.83%	10.79%	-1.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.67%	14.11%	-2.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.47%	15.51%	-1.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.19%	18.66%	-3.47%

IQQQ.DE vs. XMLC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQQQ.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XMLC.DE's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

IQQQ.DE vs. XMLC.DE - Dividend Comparison

IQQQ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, while XMLC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IQQQ.DE iShares Global Water UCITS ETF	1.65%	1.56%	1.12%	1.31%	1.17%	1.88%	1.16%	1.55%	2.08%	1.76%	1.85%	1.79%
XMLC.DE L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IQQQ.DE and XMLC.DE in my portfolio?

IQQQ.DE and XMLC.DE have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IQQQ.DE or XMLC.DE?

On fees, XMLC.DE is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IQQQ.DE or XMLC.DE?

XMLC.DE is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IQQQ.DE.

What is the main difference between IQQQ.DE and XMLC.DE?

IQQQ.DE tracks S&P Global Water, while XMLC.DE tracks Solactive Clean Water. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IQQQ.DE and 0.49% for XMLC.DE.