PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQQQ.DE vs. NQSE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQQQ.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Global Water UCITS ETF (IQQQ.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQQQ.DE achieves a -0.71% return, which is significantly lower than NQSE.DE's 17.82% return.


IQQQ.DE

1D
-0.44%
1M
-3.72%
YTD
-0.71%
6M
-1.42%
1Y
1.94%
3Y*
6.09%
5Y*
5.32%
10Y*
9.10%

NQSE.DE

1D
-0.77%
1M
6.66%
YTD
17.82%
6M
17.09%
1Y
35.67%
3Y*
25.27%
5Y*
14.91%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQQQ.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IQQQ.DE
iShares Global Water UCITS ETF
-0.71%5.27%10.22%9.85%-16.58%42.81%4.77%38.59%-8.72%
NQSE.DE
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF
17.82%18.16%24.07%52.10%-36.29%27.37%45.23%35.67%-15.98%

Correlation

The correlation between IQQQ.DE and NQSE.DE is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2018

0.53

Over the past year, the correlation between IQQQ.DE and NQSE.DE has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQQQ.DE vs. NQSE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQQQ.DE
IQQQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
IQQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

NQSE.DE
NQSE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
NQSE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NQSE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
NQSE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
NQSE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
NQSE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQQQ.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Water UCITS ETF (IQQQ.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IQQQ.DENQSE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.39

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.19

3.08

-2.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.49

10.77

-10.27

IQQQ.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the NQSE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQQQ.DE and NQSE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IQQQ.DENQSE.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

2.28

-2.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.71

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.82

-0.32

Drawdowns

IQQQ.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQQQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -48.04%, which is greater than NQSE.DE's maximum drawdown of -37.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQQ.DE and NQSE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQQQ.DENQSE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.04%

-37.67%

-10.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.94%

-11.87%

+2.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.50%

-22.40%

+4.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.39%

-37.67%

+13.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.97%

-0.84%

-7.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.76%

-8.56%

+0.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.51%

3.40%

+0.11%

Volatility

IQQQ.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Water UCITS ETF (IQQQ.DE) is 3.43%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE) has a volatility of 4.75%. This indicates that IQQQ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NQSE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQQQ.DENQSE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.43%

4.75%

-1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.83%

11.99%

-3.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.67%

16.05%

-4.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.47%

20.91%

-6.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.19%

21.54%

-6.35%

IQQQ.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQQQ.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than NQSE.DE's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQQQ.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Dividend Comparison

IQQQ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, while NQSE.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IQQQ.DE
iShares Global Water UCITS ETF
1.65%1.56%1.12%1.31%1.17%1.88%1.16%1.55%2.08%1.76%1.85%1.79%
NQSE.DE
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IQQQ.DE and NQSE.DE have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NQSE.DE is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NQSE.DE is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IQQQ.DE.

IQQQ.DE is categorized as Water Equities, while NQSE.DE is Nasdaq-100. IQQQ.DE tracks S&P Global Water, while NQSE.DE tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IQQQ.DE and 0.33% for NQSE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQQQ.DE and NQSE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer