PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQQN.DE vs. XRSM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQQN.DE vs. XRSM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI North America UCITS ETF (IQQN.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XRSM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IQQN.DE having a 10.41% return and XRSM.DE slightly lower at 10.32%. Over the past 10 years, IQQN.DE has outperformed XRSM.DE with an annualized return of 14.56%, while XRSM.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 13.75% annualized return.


IQQN.DE

1D
-0.92%
1M
0.29%
YTD
10.41%
6M
10.72%
1Y
24.25%
3Y*
18.66%
5Y*
13.01%
10Y*
14.56%

XRSM.DE

1D
-1.09%
1M
0.21%
YTD
10.32%
6M
10.25%
1Y
24.87%
3Y*
19.47%
5Y*
13.21%
10Y*
13.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQQN.DE vs. XRSM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IQQN.DE
iShares MSCI North America UCITS ETF
10.41%4.95%31.43%22.31%-15.50%38.10%8.53%34.22%-2.32%6.17%
XRSM.DE
Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C
10.32%4.95%33.21%25.49%-17.04%39.25%5.31%33.46%-6.52%3.51%

Correlation

The correlation between IQQN.DE and XRSM.DE is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2015

0.95

The correlation between IQQN.DE and XRSM.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQQN.DE vs. XRSM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQQN.DE
IQQN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
IQQN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

XRSM.DE
XRSM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
XRSM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRSM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRSM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
XRSM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRSM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQQN.DE vs. XRSM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI North America UCITS ETF (IQQN.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XRSM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IQQN.DEXRSM.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.34

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.34

2.91

+0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.68

10.10

+1.58

IQQN.DE vs. XRSM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQQN.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the XRSM.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQQN.DE and XRSM.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IQQN.DE vs. XRSM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQQN.DE drawdown since its inception was -52.40%, which is greater than XRSM.DE's maximum drawdown of -40.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQN.DE and XRSM.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQQN.DEXRSM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.40%

-40.30%

-12.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.22%

-8.52%

+1.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.46%

-24.45%

+0.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.46%

-24.45%

+0.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.38%

-40.30%

+5.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

-1.28%

+0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.12%

-7.05%

-2.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

2.46%

-0.39%

Volatility

IQQN.DE vs. XRSM.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI North America UCITS ETF (IQQN.DE) is 3.30%, while Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XRSM.DE) has a volatility of 3.75%. This indicates that IQQN.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XRSM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQQN.DEXRSM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.30%

3.75%

-0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.01%

8.94%

-0.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.88%

12.85%

-0.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.29%

16.09%

-0.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.10%

18.16%

-2.06%

IQQN.DE vs. XRSM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQQN.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XRSM.DE's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQQN.DE vs. XRSM.DE - Dividend Comparison

IQQN.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, while XRSM.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IQQN.DE
iShares MSCI North America UCITS ETF
0.60%0.68%0.75%0.99%1.15%0.73%1.09%1.22%1.42%1.34%1.37%1.53%
XRSM.DE
Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, IQQN.DE and XRSM.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XRSM.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XRSM.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IQQN.DE.

IQQN.DE tracks MSCI North America, while XRSM.DE tracks MSCI USA Select ESG Screened. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IQQN.DE and 0.07% for XRSM.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQQN.DE and XRSM.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer