PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQQN.DE vs. SXRV.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQQN.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI North America UCITS ETF (IQQN.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXRV.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQQN.DE achieves a 11.09% return, which is significantly lower than SXRV.DE's 20.57% return. Over the past 10 years, IQQN.DE has underperformed SXRV.DE with an annualized return of 14.38%, while SXRV.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 21.24% annualized return.


IQQN.DE

1D
-0.05%
1M
4.42%
YTD
11.09%
6M
10.54%
1Y
24.97%
3Y*
18.64%
5Y*
13.97%
10Y*
14.38%

SXRV.DE

1D
-0.83%
1M
7.99%
YTD
20.57%
6M
18.73%
1Y
37.06%
3Y*
24.53%
5Y*
18.67%
10Y*
21.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQQN.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IQQN.DE
iShares MSCI North America UCITS ETF
11.09%4.95%31.43%22.31%-15.50%38.10%8.53%34.21%-2.31%6.17%
SXRV.DE
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
20.57%6.98%33.55%51.19%-30.05%39.34%34.48%42.90%3.03%15.81%

Correlation

The correlation between IQQN.DE and SXRV.DE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2010

0.88

The correlation between IQQN.DE and SXRV.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQQN.DE vs. SXRV.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQQN.DE
IQQN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
IQQN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

SXRV.DE
SXRV.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SXRV.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXRV.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXRV.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
SXRV.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXRV.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQQN.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI North America UCITS ETF (IQQN.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXRV.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IQQN.DESXRV.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.42

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

3.75

-0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.25

11.16

+1.09

IQQN.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQQN.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the SXRV.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQQN.DE and SXRV.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IQQN.DESXRV.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

2.40

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

0.93

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

1.07

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.91

-0.32

Drawdowns

IQQN.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQQN.DE drawdown since its inception was -52.40%, which is greater than SXRV.DE's maximum drawdown of -32.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQN.DE and SXRV.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQQN.DESXRV.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.40%

-32.80%

-19.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.22%

-10.03%

+2.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.46%

-26.69%

+3.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.46%

-31.33%

+7.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.38%

-31.33%

-3.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-0.83%

+0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.11%

-6.56%

-2.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

3.38%

-1.33%

Volatility

IQQN.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI North America UCITS ETF (IQQN.DE) is 2.66%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXRV.DE) has a volatility of 4.26%. This indicates that IQQN.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SXRV.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQQN.DESXRV.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

4.26%

-1.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.55%

10.98%

-3.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.56%

15.67%

-4.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.24%

19.84%

-4.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.09%

19.65%

-3.56%

IQQN.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQQN.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SXRV.DE's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQQN.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Dividend Comparison

IQQN.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, while SXRV.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IQQN.DE
iShares MSCI North America UCITS ETF
0.61%0.68%0.75%0.99%1.15%0.73%1.09%1.22%1.42%1.34%1.37%1.53%
SXRV.DE
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, IQQN.DE and SXRV.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SXRV.DE is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SXRV.DE is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IQQN.DE.

IQQN.DE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SXRV.DE is Nasdaq-100. IQQN.DE tracks MSCI North America, while SXRV.DE tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IQQN.DE and 0.36% for SXRV.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQQN.DE and SXRV.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer