PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQQK.DE vs. FLXK.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQQK.DE vs. FLXK.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist) (IQQK.DE) and Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLXK.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQQK.DE achieves a 107.68% return, which is significantly lower than FLXK.DE's 113.07% return.


IQQK.DE

1D
-4.65%
1M
11.93%
YTD
107.68%
6M
121.46%
1Y
216.52%
3Y*
44.83%
5Y*
19.47%
10Y*
16.55%

FLXK.DE

1D
-5.45%
1M
13.51%
YTD
113.07%
6M
125.49%
1Y
216.17%
3Y*
46.07%
5Y*
20.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQQK.DE vs. FLXK.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IQQK.DE
iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist)
107.68%77.35%-18.08%15.54%-24.11%-1.13%30.60%15.55%
FLXK.DE
Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF
113.07%73.17%-17.06%16.74%-23.45%0.14%34.15%14.19%

Correlation

The correlation between IQQK.DE and FLXK.DE is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2019

0.99

The correlation between IQQK.DE and FLXK.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQQK.DE vs. FLXK.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQQK.DE
IQQK.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
IQQK.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQK.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQK.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQK.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQK.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

FLXK.DE
FLXK.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FLXK.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXK.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXK.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXK.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXK.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQQK.DE vs. FLXK.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist) (IQQK.DE) and Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLXK.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IQQK.DEFLXK.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.78

1.79

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.70

10.68

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

38.75

38.63

+0.12

IQQK.DE vs. FLXK.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQQK.DE Sharpe Ratio is 5.92, which is comparable to the FLXK.DE Sharpe Ratio of 5.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQQK.DE and FLXK.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IQQK.DEFLXK.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.92

5.91

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.80

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.84

-0.52

Drawdowns

IQQK.DE vs. FLXK.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQQK.DE drawdown since its inception was -68.13%, which is greater than FLXK.DE's maximum drawdown of -39.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQK.DE and FLXK.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQQK.DEFLXK.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.13%

-39.43%

-28.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.96%

-20.92%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.51%

-29.99%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.53%

-39.36%

-2.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.73%

-5.90%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.35%

-15.54%

-1.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.80%

5.80%

0.00%

Volatility

IQQK.DE vs. FLXK.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist) (IQQK.DE) and Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLXK.DE) have volatilities of 17.23% and 17.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQQK.DEFLXK.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.23%

17.58%

-0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.01%

33.23%

-0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.90%

37.87%

+0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.65%

25.35%

+0.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.84%

26.75%

-1.91%

IQQK.DE vs. FLXK.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQQK.DE has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than FLXK.DE's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQQK.DE vs. FLXK.DE - Dividend Comparison

IQQK.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, while FLXK.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLXK.DE
Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IQQK.DE
iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist)
0.36%0.75%1.17%1.07%1.29%1.11%0.69%1.12%0.89%0.69%0.56%0.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, IQQK.DE and FLXK.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, FLXK.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLXK.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IQQK.DE.

IQQK.DE tracks MSCI Korea 20/35, while FLXK.DE tracks FTSE Korea 30/18 Capped. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for IQQK.DE and 0.09% for FLXK.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQQK.DE and FLXK.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer