PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQQJ.DE vs. XCJD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQQJ.DE vs. XCJD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) (IQQJ.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF (XCJD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQQJ.DE achieves a 16.83% return, which is significantly higher than XCJD.DE's 14.53% return.


IQQJ.DE

1D
-14.69%
1M
5.85%
YTD
16.83%
6M
16.70%
1Y
30.57%
3Y*
15.45%
5Y*
9.84%
10Y*
8.94%

XCJD.DE

1D
-0.41%
1M
5.00%
YTD
14.53%
6M
13.84%
1Y
25.82%
3Y*
10.79%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQQJ.DE vs. XCJD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IQQJ.DE
iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (Dist)
16.83%12.69%13.58%8.37%
XCJD.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF
14.53%10.16%6.89%6.37%

Correlation

The correlation between IQQJ.DE and XCJD.DE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2023

0.95

The correlation between IQQJ.DE and XCJD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQQJ.DE vs. XCJD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQQJ.DE
IQQJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
IQQJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

XCJD.DE
XCJD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
XCJD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCJD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCJD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
XCJD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCJD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQQJ.DE vs. XCJD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) (IQQJ.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF (XCJD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IQQJ.DEXCJD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.26

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

2.44

-0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.16

8.19

+0.98

IQQJ.DE vs. XCJD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQQJ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is lower than the XCJD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQQJ.DE and XCJD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IQQJ.DEXCJD.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

1.38

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.69

-0.41

Drawdowns

IQQJ.DE vs. XCJD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQQJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -54.99%, which is greater than XCJD.DE's maximum drawdown of -16.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQJ.DE and XCJD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQQJ.DEXCJD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.99%

-16.48%

-38.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.69%

-10.52%

-4.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.72%

-16.48%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.69%

-0.41%

-14.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.84%

-3.78%

-13.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.33%

3.15%

+0.18%

Volatility

IQQJ.DE vs. XCJD.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) (IQQJ.DE) has a higher volatility of 30.30% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF (XCJD.DE) at 3.70%. This indicates that IQQJ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCJD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQQJ.DEXCJD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

30.30%

3.70%

+26.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.04%

14.79%

+18.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.82%

18.65%

+16.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.13%

17.01%

+4.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.82%

17.01%

+1.81%

IQQJ.DE vs. XCJD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQQJ.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than XCJD.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IQQJ.DE vs. XCJD.DE - Dividend Comparison

IQQJ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, more than XCJD.DE's 1.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IQQJ.DE
iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (Dist)
1.52%1.79%1.48%1.42%1.76%1.16%1.40%1.41%1.44%1.23%1.21%0.57%
XCJD.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF
1.21%1.36%2.05%1.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, IQQJ.DE and XCJD.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, IQQJ.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IQQJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for XCJD.DE.

IQQJ.DE tracks MSCI Japan, while XCJD.DE tracks MSCI Japan Select Sustainability Screened CTB. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for IQQJ.DE and 0.15% for XCJD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQQJ.DE and XCJD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer