PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQQI.DE vs. CBUG.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQQI.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF (IQQI.DE) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP hedged (Dist) (CBUG.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQQI.DE achieves a 14.89% return, which is significantly lower than CBUG.DE's 18.13% return.


IQQI.DE

1D
0.32%
1M
1.20%
YTD
14.89%
6M
15.89%
1Y
20.42%
3Y*
10.56%
5Y*
7.56%
10Y*
7.26%

CBUG.DE

1D
0.65%
1M
4.21%
YTD
18.13%
6M
18.13%
1Y
33.69%
3Y*
15.67%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQQI.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IQQI.DE
iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF
14.89%0.56%14.53%-3.18%-0.38%2.43%
CBUG.DE
iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP hedged (Dist)
18.13%6.50%13.10%11.25%-14.07%2.02%

Correlation

The correlation between IQQI.DE and CBUG.DE is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2021

0.46

Over the past year, the correlation between IQQI.DE and CBUG.DE has dropped to 0.19 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQQI.DE vs. CBUG.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQQI.DE
IQQI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IQQI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

CBUG.DE
CBUG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
CBUG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQQI.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF (IQQI.DE) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP hedged (Dist) (CBUG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IQQI.DECBUG.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.43

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.23

4.63

-0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.58

17.68

-7.10

IQQI.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQQI.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the CBUG.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQQI.DE and CBUG.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IQQI.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQQI.DE drawdown since its inception was -42.24%, which is greater than CBUG.DE's maximum drawdown of -24.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQI.DE and CBUG.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQQI.DECBUG.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.24%

-24.57%

-17.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.81%

-7.24%

+2.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.75%

-24.57%

+9.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.11%

-7.41%

-3.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

1.90%

+0.02%

Volatility

IQQI.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF (IQQI.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.41% compared to iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP hedged (Dist) (CBUG.DE) at 3.37%. This indicates that IQQI.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBUG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQQI.DECBUG.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.41%

3.37%

+1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.95%

10.00%

-1.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.83%

13.98%

-3.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.77%

16.66%

-3.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.25%

16.66%

-2.41%

IQQI.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQQI.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than CBUG.DE's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQQI.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Dividend Comparison

IQQI.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, while CBUG.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CBUG.DE
iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP hedged (Dist)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IQQI.DE
iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF
2.01%2.30%2.29%2.42%2.13%1.85%2.25%2.05%2.30%2.76%2.63%3.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


IQQI.DE and CBUG.DE have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CBUG.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CBUG.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IQQI.DE.

IQQI.DE tracks FTSE Global Core Infrastructure Index, while CBUG.DE tracks MSCI ACWI SMID NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IQQI.DE and 0.10% for CBUG.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQQI.DE and CBUG.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer