IQQH.DE vs. XDW0.DE
IQQH.DE (iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and XDW0.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C) are both Energy Equities funds - IQQH.DE tracks the S&P Global Clean Energy while XDW0.DE tracks the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IQQH.DE returned 11.71%/yr vs 9.20%/yr for XDW0.DE. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IQQH.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDW0.DE.
Performance
IQQH.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQQH.DE achieves a 39.28% return, which is significantly higher than XDW0.DE's 32.75% return. Over the past 10 years, IQQH.DE has outperformed XDW0.DE with an annualized return of 11.71%, while XDW0.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 9.20% annualized return.
IQQH.DE
- 1D
- -1.81%
- 1M
- 8.24%
- YTD
- 39.28%
- 6M
- 36.90%
- 1Y
- 77.84%
- 3Y*
- 5.37%
- 5Y*
- 2.58%
- 10Y*
- 11.71%
XDW0.DE
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -0.80%
- YTD
- 32.75%
- 6M
- 29.37%
- 1Y
- 45.08%
- 3Y*
- 15.71%
- 5Y*
- 20.33%
- 10Y*
- 9.20%
IQQH.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQH.DE iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 39.28% | 29.83% | -21.49% | -22.15% | 0.84% | -17.65% | 117.65% | 49.62% | -4.26% | 7.71% |
XDW0.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C | 32.75% | 2.24% | 7.48% | 0.18% | 53.95% | 52.18% | -36.97% | 14.05% | -12.13% | -7.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQQH.DE and XDW0.DE is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2016 | 0.34 |
The correlation between IQQH.DE and XDW0.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQQH.DE vs. XDW0.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IQQH.DE
XDW0.DE
IQQH.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IQQH.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IQQH.DE | XDW0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.37 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.29 | 2.98 | +3.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.88 | 9.92 | +9.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IQQH.DE | XDW0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.18 | 2.10 | +1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.84 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.35 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 0.37 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
IQQH.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQQH.DE drawdown since its inception was -86.09%, which is greater than XDW0.DE's maximum drawdown of -61.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQH.DE and XDW0.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQQH.DE | XDW0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.09% | -61.44% | -24.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.32% | -15.05% | +2.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.74% | -23.71% | -21.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.70% | -23.71% | -33.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.78% | -61.44% | -2.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.01% | -7.38% | -16.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.78% | -13.84% | -45.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.90% | 4.53% | -0.63% |
Volatility
IQQH.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IQQH.DE) has a higher volatility of 9.79% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.DE) at 6.96%. This indicates that IQQH.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDW0.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQQH.DE | XDW0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.79% | 6.96% | +2.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.31% | 18.42% | -0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.37% | 21.48% | +2.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.69% | 24.04% | +0.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.08% | 26.02% | -0.94% |
IQQH.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQQH.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XDW0.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQQH.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Dividend Comparison
IQQH.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, while XDW0.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQH.DE iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 0.94% | 1.53% | 1.32% | 1.23% | 0.83% | 1.23% | 0.56% | 2.89% | 3.30% | 4.82% | 4.72% | 2.86% |
XDW0.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQQH.DE and XDW0.DE have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDW0.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDW0.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IQQH.DE.
IQQH.DE tracks S&P Global Clean Energy, while XDW0.DE tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IQQH.DE and 0.25% for XDW0.DE.
Find the right allocation for IQQH.DE and XDW0.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer