PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQQH.DE vs. WRNW.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQQH.DE vs. WRNW.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IQQH.DE) and WisdomTree Renewable Energy UCITS ETF USD Unhedged Acc (WRNW.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQQH.DE achieves a 39.28% return, which is significantly higher than WRNW.DE's 30.17% return.


IQQH.DE

1D
-1.81%
1M
8.45%
YTD
39.28%
6M
35.95%
1Y
78.04%
3Y*
5.37%
5Y*
2.58%
10Y*
11.71%

WRNW.DE

1D
-2.37%
1M
3.73%
YTD
30.17%
6M
29.38%
1Y
107.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQQH.DE vs. WRNW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IQQH.DE
iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
39.28%29.83%-21.49%-17.48%
WRNW.DE
WisdomTree Renewable Energy UCITS ETF USD Unhedged Acc
30.17%51.49%-23.68%-12.62%

Correlation

The correlation between IQQH.DE and WRNW.DE is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2023

0.84

The correlation between IQQH.DE and WRNW.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQQH.DE vs. WRNW.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQQH.DE
IQQH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
IQQH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

WRNW.DE
WRNW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
WRNW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WRNW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
WRNW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
WRNW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
WRNW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQQH.DE vs. WRNW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IQQH.DE) and WisdomTree Renewable Energy UCITS ETF USD Unhedged Acc (WRNW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IQQH.DEWRNW.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.52

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.29

7.07

-0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.88

23.97

-4.08

IQQH.DE vs. WRNW.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQQH.DE Sharpe Ratio is 3.18, which is comparable to the WRNW.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQQH.DE and WRNW.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IQQH.DEWRNW.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.18

3.54

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.01

0.37

-0.38

Drawdowns

IQQH.DE vs. WRNW.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQQH.DE drawdown since its inception was -86.09%, which is greater than WRNW.DE's maximum drawdown of -49.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQH.DE and WRNW.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQQH.DEWRNW.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.09%

-49.14%

-36.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.32%

-15.04%

+2.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.01%

-4.04%

-19.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-59.78%

-20.88%

-38.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.90%

4.44%

-0.54%

Volatility

IQQH.DE vs. WRNW.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IQQH.DE) and WisdomTree Renewable Energy UCITS ETF USD Unhedged Acc (WRNW.DE) have volatilities of 9.79% and 10.28%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQQH.DEWRNW.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.79%

10.28%

-0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.31%

19.33%

-1.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.37%

30.01%

-5.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.69%

26.02%

-1.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.08%

26.02%

-0.94%

IQQH.DE vs. WRNW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQQH.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than WRNW.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQQH.DE vs. WRNW.DE - Dividend Comparison

IQQH.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, while WRNW.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IQQH.DE
iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.94%1.53%1.32%1.23%0.83%1.23%0.56%2.89%3.30%4.82%4.72%2.86%
WRNW.DE
WisdomTree Renewable Energy UCITS ETF USD Unhedged Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IQQH.DE and WRNW.DE have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WRNW.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WRNW.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IQQH.DE.

IQQH.DE tracks S&P Global Clean Energy, while WRNW.DE tracks WisdomTree Renewable Energy. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IQQH.DE and 0.45% for WRNW.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQQH.DE and WRNW.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer