IQQH.DE vs. JMLP.DE
IQQH.DE (iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and JMLP.DE (HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - IQQH.DE tracks the S&P Global Clean Energy while JMLP.DE tracks the Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IQQH.DE returned 2.58%/yr vs 23.96%/yr for JMLP.DE. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IQQH.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for JMLP.DE.
Performance
IQQH.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQQH.DE achieves a 39.28% return, which is significantly higher than JMLP.DE's 27.39% return.
IQQH.DE
- 1D
- -1.81%
- 1M
- 8.45%
- YTD
- 39.28%
- 6M
- 35.95%
- 1Y
- 78.04%
- 3Y*
- 5.37%
- 5Y*
- 2.58%
- 10Y*
- 11.71%
JMLP.DE
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- 3.28%
- YTD
- 27.39%
- 6M
- 23.64%
- 1Y
- 25.58%
- 3Y*
- 24.31%
- 5Y*
- 23.96%
- 10Y*
- —
IQQH.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQH.DE iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 39.28% | 29.83% | -21.49% | -22.15% | 0.84% | -17.65% | 72.98% |
JMLP.DE HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF | 27.39% | -5.93% | 44.53% | 15.63% | 34.66% | 55.73% | 7.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQQH.DE and JMLP.DE is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2020 | 0.22 |
The correlation between IQQH.DE and JMLP.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.23 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQQH.DE vs. JMLP.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IQQH.DE
JMLP.DE
IQQH.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IQQH.DE) and HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF (JMLP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IQQH.DE | JMLP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.22 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.29 | 2.22 | +4.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.88 | 6.04 | +13.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IQQH.DE | JMLP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.18 | 1.30 | +1.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 1.16 | -1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 1.35 | -1.36 |
Drawdowns
IQQH.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQQH.DE drawdown since its inception was -86.09%, which is greater than JMLP.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQH.DE and JMLP.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQQH.DE | JMLP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.09% | -22.29% | -63.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.32% | -11.02% | -1.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.43% | -22.29% | -22.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.70% | -22.29% | -35.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.01% | -5.15% | -18.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.78% | -5.87% | -53.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.90% | 4.05% | -0.15% |
Volatility
IQQH.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IQQH.DE) has a higher volatility of 9.79% compared to HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF (JMLP.DE) at 6.65%. This indicates that IQQH.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JMLP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQQH.DE | JMLP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.79% | 6.65% | +3.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.31% | 15.30% | +3.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.37% | 18.80% | +5.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.69% | 20.38% | +4.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.08% | 21.66% | +3.42% |
IQQH.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQQH.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than JMLP.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQQH.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Dividend Comparison
IQQH.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than JMLP.DE's 2.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQH.DE iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 0.94% | 1.53% | 1.32% | 1.23% | 0.83% | 1.23% | 0.56% | 2.89% | 3.30% | 4.82% | 4.72% | 2.86% |
JMLP.DE HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF | 2.77% | 3.38% | 5.41% | 11.39% | 11.27% | 14.07% | 8.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQQH.DE and JMLP.DE have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JMLP.DE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JMLP.DE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IQQH.DE.
IQQH.DE tracks S&P Global Clean Energy, while JMLP.DE tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend. They also come from different issuers: iShares and HANetf. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IQQH.DE and 0.40% for JMLP.DE.
Find the right allocation for IQQH.DE and JMLP.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer