IQQH.DE vs. DBXD.DE
IQQH.DE (iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and DBXD.DE (Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - IQQH.DE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Clean Energy, while DBXD.DE is a Europe Equities fund tracking the DAX®. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IQQH.DE returned 11.71%/yr vs 8.92%/yr for DBXD.DE. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IQQH.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for DBXD.DE.
Performance
IQQH.DE vs. DBXD.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQQH.DE achieves a 39.28% return, which is significantly higher than DBXD.DE's 1.35% return. Over the past 10 years, IQQH.DE has outperformed DBXD.DE with an annualized return of 11.71%, while DBXD.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 8.92% annualized return.
IQQH.DE
- 1D
- -1.81%
- 1M
- 8.45%
- YTD
- 39.28%
- 6M
- 35.95%
- 1Y
- 78.04%
- 3Y*
- 5.37%
- 5Y*
- 2.58%
- 10Y*
- 11.71%
DBXD.DE
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- YTD
- 1.35%
- 6M
- 3.40%
- 1Y
- 2.06%
- 3Y*
- 15.51%
- 5Y*
- 9.16%
- 10Y*
- 8.92%
IQQH.DE vs. DBXD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQH.DE iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 39.28% | 29.83% | -21.49% | -22.15% | 0.84% | -17.65% | 117.65% | 49.62% | -4.26% | 7.71% |
DBXD.DE Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C | 1.35% | 22.65% | 18.18% | 19.60% | -12.74% | 15.26% | 3.11% | 24.69% | -18.52% | 12.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQQH.DE and DBXD.DE is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2007 | 0.57 |
The correlation between IQQH.DE and DBXD.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQQH.DE vs. DBXD.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IQQH.DE
DBXD.DE
IQQH.DE vs. DBXD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IQQH.DE) and Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (DBXD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IQQH.DE | DBXD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.04 | +0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.29 | 0.19 | +6.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.88 | 0.58 | +19.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IQQH.DE | DBXD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.18 | 0.14 | +3.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.53 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.48 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 0.31 | -0.32 |
Drawdowns
IQQH.DE vs. DBXD.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQQH.DE drawdown since its inception was -86.09%, which is greater than DBXD.DE's maximum drawdown of -54.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQH.DE and DBXD.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQQH.DE | DBXD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.09% | -54.98% | -31.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.32% | -12.28% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.43% | -15.92% | -28.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.70% | -26.70% | -31.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.78% | -38.83% | -24.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.01% | -2.23% | -21.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.78% | -11.34% | -48.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.90% | 3.97% | -0.07% |
Volatility
IQQH.DE vs. DBXD.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IQQH.DE) has a higher volatility of 9.79% compared to Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (DBXD.DE) at 5.10%. This indicates that IQQH.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBXD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQQH.DE | DBXD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.79% | 5.10% | +4.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.31% | 12.95% | +5.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.37% | 16.13% | +8.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.69% | 17.16% | +7.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.08% | 18.35% | +6.73% |
IQQH.DE vs. DBXD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQQH.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than DBXD.DE's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQQH.DE vs. DBXD.DE - Dividend Comparison
IQQH.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, while DBXD.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBXD.DE Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IQQH.DE iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 0.94% | 1.53% | 1.32% | 1.23% | 0.83% | 1.23% | 0.56% | 2.89% | 3.30% | 4.82% | 4.72% | 2.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQQH.DE and DBXD.DE have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DBXD.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DBXD.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IQQH.DE.
IQQH.DE is categorized as Energy Equities, while DBXD.DE is Europe Equities. IQQH.DE tracks S&P Global Clean Energy, while DBXD.DE tracks DAX®. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IQQH.DE and 0.09% for DBXD.DE.
Find the right allocation for IQQH.DE and DBXD.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer