IQQH.DE vs. AMEE.DE
IQQH.DE (iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and AMEE.DE (Amundi Global Hydrogen ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc) are both Energy Equities funds - IQQH.DE tracks the S&P Global Clean Energy while AMEE.DE tracks the Bloomberg Hydrogen ESG. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IQQH.DE returned 11.71%/yr vs 15.13%/yr for AMEE.DE. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IQQH.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for AMEE.DE.
Performance
IQQH.DE vs. AMEE.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQQH.DE achieves a 39.28% return, which is significantly higher than AMEE.DE's 27.83% return. Over the past 10 years, IQQH.DE has underperformed AMEE.DE with an annualized return of 11.71%, while AMEE.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 15.13% annualized return.
IQQH.DE
- 1D
- -1.81%
- 1M
- 8.45%
- YTD
- 39.28%
- 6M
- 35.95%
- 1Y
- 78.04%
- 3Y*
- 5.37%
- 5Y*
- 2.58%
- 10Y*
- 11.71%
AMEE.DE
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -3.42%
- YTD
- 27.83%
- 6M
- 25.69%
- 1Y
- 62.63%
- 3Y*
- 32.97%
- 5Y*
- 28.59%
- 10Y*
- 15.13%
IQQH.DE vs. AMEE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQH.DE iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 39.28% | 29.83% | -21.49% | -22.15% | 0.84% | -17.65% | 117.65% | 49.62% | -4.26% | 7.71% |
AMEE.DE Amundi Global Hydrogen ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc | 27.83% | 37.58% | 15.56% | 12.19% | 35.81% | 34.64% | -31.29% | 10.32% | -0.78% | 5.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQQH.DE and AMEE.DE is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2011 | 0.46 |
Over the past year, IQQH.DE and AMEE.DE have become more correlated (0.70) than their long-term average of 0.46, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQQH.DE vs. AMEE.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IQQH.DE
AMEE.DE
IQQH.DE vs. AMEE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IQQH.DE) and Amundi Global Hydrogen ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc (AMEE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IQQH.DE | AMEE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.52 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.29 | 7.71 | -1.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.88 | 23.88 | -3.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IQQH.DE | AMEE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.18 | 3.24 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 1.27 | -1.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.58 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 0.41 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
IQQH.DE vs. AMEE.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQQH.DE drawdown since its inception was -86.09%, which is greater than AMEE.DE's maximum drawdown of -59.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQH.DE and AMEE.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQQH.DE | AMEE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.09% | -59.14% | -26.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.32% | -7.92% | -4.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.43% | -15.74% | -28.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.70% | -19.23% | -38.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.78% | -59.14% | -4.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.01% | -3.54% | -20.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.78% | -10.65% | -49.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.90% | 2.56% | +1.34% |
Volatility
IQQH.DE vs. AMEE.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IQQH.DE) has a higher volatility of 9.79% compared to Amundi Global Hydrogen ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc (AMEE.DE) at 7.10%. This indicates that IQQH.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMEE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQQH.DE | AMEE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.79% | 7.10% | +2.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.31% | 14.18% | +4.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.37% | 18.89% | +5.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.69% | 22.25% | +2.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.08% | 25.74% | -0.66% |
IQQH.DE vs. AMEE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQQH.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than AMEE.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQQH.DE vs. AMEE.DE - Dividend Comparison
IQQH.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, while AMEE.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMEE.DE Amundi Global Hydrogen ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IQQH.DE iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 0.94% | 1.53% | 1.32% | 1.23% | 0.83% | 1.23% | 0.56% | 2.89% | 3.30% | 4.82% | 4.72% | 2.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQQH.DE and AMEE.DE have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMEE.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMEE.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IQQH.DE.
IQQH.DE tracks S&P Global Clean Energy, while AMEE.DE tracks Bloomberg Hydrogen ESG. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IQQH.DE and 0.45% for AMEE.DE.
Find the right allocation for IQQH.DE and AMEE.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer