IQQC.DE vs. FLXC.DE
IQQC.DE (iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF) and FLXC.DE (Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF) are both China Equities funds - IQQC.DE tracks the FTSE China 50 while FLXC.DE tracks the FTSE China 30/18 Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IQQC.DE returned -2.24%/yr vs -3.95%/yr for FLXC.DE. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. IQQC.DE charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLXC.DE.
Performance
IQQC.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQQC.DE achieves a -7.00% return, which is significantly lower than FLXC.DE's -5.94% return.
IQQC.DE
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -3.70%
- YTD
- -7.00%
- 6M
- -9.66%
- 1Y
- -2.21%
- 3Y*
- 8.94%
- 5Y*
- -2.24%
- 10Y*
- 2.69%
FLXC.DE
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -3.82%
- YTD
- -5.94%
- 6M
- -8.20%
- 1Y
- 4.53%
- 3Y*
- 7.94%
- 5Y*
- -3.95%
- 10Y*
- —
IQQC.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQC.DE iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF | -7.00% | 14.32% | 39.12% | -16.33% | -13.36% | -15.34% | -1.10% | 13.30% |
FLXC.DE Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF | -5.94% | 17.34% | 27.28% | -15.77% | -15.90% | -14.60% | 16.83% | 19.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQQC.DE and FLXC.DE is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2019 | 0.96 |
The correlation between IQQC.DE and FLXC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQQC.DE vs. FLXC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IQQC.DE
FLXC.DE
IQQC.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF (IQQC.DE) and Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF (FLXC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IQQC.DE | FLXC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.06 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | 0.31 | -0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.23 | 0.64 | -0.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IQQC.DE | FLXC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 | 0.27 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 | -0.15 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.09 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
IQQC.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQQC.DE drawdown since its inception was -67.50%, which is greater than FLXC.DE's maximum drawdown of -55.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQC.DE and FLXC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQQC.DE | FLXC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.50% | -55.61% | -11.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.24% | -15.19% | -0.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.71% | -24.70% | -3.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.35% | -49.07% | +1.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.02% | -30.89% | +6.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.16% | -27.95% | -0.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.16% | 7.38% | -0.22% |
Volatility
IQQC.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF (IQQC.DE) and Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF (FLXC.DE) have volatilities of 6.75% and 6.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQQC.DE | FLXC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.75% | 6.78% | -0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.55% | 12.35% | +0.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.72% | 17.78% | -0.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.20% | 26.71% | +1.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.07% | 26.20% | -1.13% |
IQQC.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQQC.DE has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than FLXC.DE's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQQC.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Dividend Comparison
IQQC.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, while FLXC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLXC.DE Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IQQC.DE iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF | 1.92% | 1.78% | 2.26% | 2.52% | 2.51% | 1.85% | 2.51% | 2.45% | 3.03% | 2.38% | 2.33% | 2.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, IQQC.DE and FLXC.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, FLXC.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLXC.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IQQC.DE.
IQQC.DE tracks FTSE China 50, while FLXC.DE tracks FTSE China 30/18 Capped. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for IQQC.DE and 0.19% for FLXC.DE.
Find the right allocation for IQQC.DE and FLXC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer