PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQQ vs. XQQI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQQ vs. XQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Nasdaq 100 ETF (IQQ) and NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (XQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


IQQ

1D
-0.90%
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

XQQI

1D
-0.84%
1M
-1.83%
6M
14.44%
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$30.00M$35.28M$35.28M
$12.47M$13.60M$14.39M

IQQ vs. XQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IQQ and XQQI is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2026

0.99

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQQ vs. XQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nasdaq 100 ETF (IQQ) and NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (XQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IQQ vs. XQQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IQQ vs. XQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQQ drawdown since its inception was -8.80%, smaller than the maximum XQQI drawdown of -15.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQ and XQQI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQQXQQIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.80%

-15.48%

+6.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.14%

-5.50%

+4.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.39%

-3.86%

+0.47%

Volatility

IQQ vs. XQQI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQQXQQIDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.88%

28.67%

-2.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.88%

28.67%

-2.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.88%

28.67%

-2.79%

IQQ vs. XQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQQ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than XQQI's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQQ vs. XQQI - Dividend Comparison

IQQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XQQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.04%.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, IQQ and XQQI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, IQQ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IQQ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for XQQI.

XQQI has the higher dividend yield at 12.04%, compared with 0.00% for IQQ.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IQQ and 0.98% for XQQI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQQ and XQQI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer