IQQ vs. QMAR
IQQ (iShares Nasdaq 100 ETF) and QMAR (FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. IQQ is passively managed, while QMAR is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IQQ charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for QMAR.
Performance
IQQ vs. QMAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IQQ
- 1D
- 1.87%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
QMAR
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -0.36%
- 6M
- 12.43%
- YTD
- 12.33%
- 1Y
- 18.59%
- 3Y*
- 15.26%
- 5Y*
- 11.17%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.18%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $42.46M | $42.46M | $42.46M |
IQQ vs. QMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IQQ iShares Nasdaq 100 ETF | -1.68% |
QMAR FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March | 0.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQQ and QMAR is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2026 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQQ vs. QMAR — Risk / Return Rank
IQQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QMAR
IQQ vs. QMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nasdaq 100 ETF (IQQ) and FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IQQ | QMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.61 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.81 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 31.30 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IQQ vs. QMAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQQ drawdown since its inception was -4.15%, smaller than the maximum QMAR drawdown of -19.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQ and QMAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQQ | QMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.15% | -19.83% | +15.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.28% | -0.83% | -1.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.89% | -3.23% | +1.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.60% | — |
Volatility
IQQ vs. QMAR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQQ | QMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.27% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.89% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.24% | 6.72% | +13.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.24% | 14.03% | +6.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.24% | 13.76% | +6.48% |
IQQ vs. QMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQQ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than QMAR's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQQ vs. QMAR - Dividend Comparison
Neither IQQ nor QMAR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, IQQ and QMAR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, IQQ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IQQ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for QMAR.
IQQ and QMAR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IQQ and 0.90% for QMAR.
Find the right allocation for IQQ and QMAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer