IQQ vs. QDEC
IQQ (iShares Nasdaq 100 ETF) and QDEC (FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF – December) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. IQQ is passively managed, while QDEC is actively managed. Their 0.97 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. IQQ charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for QDEC.
Performance
IQQ vs. QDEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IQQ
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
QDEC
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- 6M
- 11.11%
- YTD
- 10.22%
- 1Y
- 20.66%
- 3Y*
- 16.91%
- 5Y*
- 10.05%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.11%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $30.00M | $35.28M | $35.28M | |
| $1.44M | $838.52K | $1.02M |
IQQ vs. QDEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IQQ iShares Nasdaq 100 ETF | -0.53% |
QDEC FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF – December | 1.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQQ and QDEC is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2026 | 0.97 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQQ vs. QDEC — Risk / Return Rank
IQQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QDEC
IQQ vs. QDEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nasdaq 100 ETF (IQQ) and FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF – December (QDEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IQQ | QDEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.37 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.74 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.34 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IQQ vs. QDEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQQ drawdown since its inception was -8.80%, smaller than the maximum QDEC drawdown of -25.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQ and QDEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQQ | QDEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.80% | -25.25% | +16.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.14% | 0.00% | -1.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.39% | -4.91% | +1.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.68% | — |
Volatility
IQQ vs. QDEC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQQ | QDEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.27% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.30% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.88% | 10.37% | +15.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.88% | 14.82% | +11.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.88% | 14.52% | +11.36% |
IQQ vs. QDEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQQ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than QDEC's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQQ vs. QDEC - Dividend Comparison
Neither IQQ nor QDEC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, IQQ and QDEC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, IQQ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IQQ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for QDEC.
IQQ and QDEC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IQQ and 0.90% for QDEC.
Find the right allocation for IQQ and QDEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer