IQQ vs. QCAP
IQQ (iShares Nasdaq 100 ETF) and QCAP (FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. IQQ is passively managed, while QCAP is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IQQ charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for QCAP.
Performance
IQQ vs. QCAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IQQ
- 1D
- 1.87%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
QCAP
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -0.39%
- 6M
- 4.49%
- YTD
- 4.58%
- 1Y
- 8.27%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.14%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $42.46M | $42.46M | $42.46M |
IQQ vs. QCAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IQQ iShares Nasdaq 100 ETF | -1.68% |
QCAP FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April | 0.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQQ and QCAP is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2026 | 0.88 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQQ vs. QCAP — Risk / Return Rank
IQQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QCAP
IQQ vs. QCAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nasdaq 100 ETF (IQQ) and FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April (QCAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IQQ | QCAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.49 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.95 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 22.36 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IQQ vs. QCAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQQ drawdown since its inception was -4.15%, smaller than the maximum QCAP drawdown of -9.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQ and QCAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQQ | QCAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.15% | -9.17% | +5.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.28% | -0.70% | -1.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.89% | -0.53% | -1.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.37% | — |
Volatility
IQQ vs. QCAP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQQ | QCAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.87% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.54% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.24% | 3.88% | +16.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.24% | 8.70% | +11.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.24% | 8.70% | +11.54% |
IQQ vs. QCAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQQ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than QCAP's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQQ vs. QCAP - Dividend Comparison
Neither IQQ nor QCAP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IQQ and QCAP have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IQQ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IQQ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for QCAP.
IQQ and QCAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IQQ and 0.90% for QCAP.
Find the right allocation for IQQ and QCAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer