IQQ vs. ACWI
IQQ (iShares Nasdaq 100 ETF) and ACWI (iShares MSCI ACWI ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while ACWI is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IQQ charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for ACWI.
Performance
IQQ vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IQQ
- 1D
- 1.87%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
ACWI
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- -0.92%
- 6M
- 10.50%
- YTD
- 11.18%
- 1Y
- 21.95%
- 3Y*
- 18.78%
- 5Y*
- 10.87%
- 10Y*
- 12.49%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.47%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $42.46M | $42.46M | $42.46M |
IQQ vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IQQ iShares Nasdaq 100 ETF | -1.68% |
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 0.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQQ and ACWI is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2026 | 0.92 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQQ vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank
IQQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ACWI
IQQ vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nasdaq 100 ETF (IQQ) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IQQ | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.29 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.27 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.61 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IQQ vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQQ drawdown since its inception was -4.15%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQ and ACWI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQQ | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.15% | -56.00% | +51.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.28% | -1.67% | -0.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.89% | -8.56% | +6.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.29% | — |
Volatility
IQQ vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQQ | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.79% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.63% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.24% | 13.80% | +6.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.24% | 16.19% | +4.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.24% | 17.05% | +3.19% |
IQQ vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQQ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQQ vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison
IQQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 1.44% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.88% | 1.79% | 1.71% | 1.43% | 2.33% | 2.18% | 1.94% | 2.19% | 2.56% |
IQQ iShares Nasdaq 100 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, IQQ and ACWI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, IQQ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IQQ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWI.
ACWI has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 0.00% for IQQ.
IQQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while ACWI is Global Equities. IQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IQQ and 0.32% for ACWI.
Find the right allocation for IQQ and ACWI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer