PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQLT vs. SFLR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQLT vs. SFLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT) and Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQLT achieves a 9.81% return, which is significantly higher than SFLR's 3.84% return.


IQLT

1D
0.04%
1M
1.57%
YTD
9.81%
6M
11.22%
1Y
18.29%
3Y*
14.25%
5Y*
7.32%
10Y*
10.17%

SFLR

1D
0.34%
1M
0.39%
YTD
3.84%
6M
4.29%
1Y
16.87%
3Y*
14.88%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQLT vs. SFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IQLT
iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF
9.81%25.42%1.54%18.73%7.13%
SFLR
Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF
3.84%13.29%19.99%21.20%0.42%

Correlation

The correlation between IQLT and SFLR is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2022

0.69

The correlation between IQLT and SFLR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQLT vs. SFLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQLT
IQLT Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
IQLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQLT Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
IQLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQLT Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

SFLR
SFLR Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
SFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQLT vs. SFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT) and Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IQLTSFLRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.33

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

2.40

-0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.18

9.51

-3.33

IQLT vs. SFLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQLT Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the SFLR Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQLT and SFLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IQLT vs. SFLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQLT drawdown since its inception was -32.21%, which is greater than SFLR's maximum drawdown of -12.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQLT and SFLR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQLTSFLRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.21%

-12.13%

-20.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.38%

-6.79%

-3.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.18%

-12.13%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-2.22%

+2.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.21%

-1.75%

-4.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.74%

1.71%

+1.03%

Volatility

IQLT vs. SFLR - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT) has a higher volatility of 5.41% compared to Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR) at 3.81%. This indicates that IQLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SFLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQLTSFLRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.41%

3.81%

+1.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.72%

7.29%

+5.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.00%

9.46%

+5.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.55%

10.28%

+6.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.00%

10.28%

+6.72%

IQLT vs. SFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQLT has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than SFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQLT vs. SFLR - Dividend Comparison

IQLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, more than SFLR's 0.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IQLT
iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF
2.12%2.33%2.87%2.27%3.14%2.24%1.61%2.28%2.72%2.36%2.91%2.78%
SFLR
Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF
0.32%0.33%0.42%1.16%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IQLT and SFLR have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IQLT has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to SFLR (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQLT dropped -32.21% vs SFLR's -12.13%.

On 3-year performance, SFLR leads with 14.88% vs 14.25% for IQLT. On fees, IQLT is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, SFLR has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SFLR has performed better with a 14.88% return vs 14.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IQLT is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SFLR.

IQLT has the higher dividend yield at 2.12%, compared with 0.32% for SFLR.

IQLT is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while SFLR is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IQLT and 0.89% for SFLR.

SFLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQLT and SFLR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer