PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQLT vs. ESGV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQLT vs. ESGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT) and Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IQLT having a 10.27% return and ESGV slightly higher at 10.76%.


IQLT

1D
0.42%
1M
3.66%
YTD
10.27%
6M
10.93%
1Y
18.79%
3Y*
13.94%
5Y*
7.47%
10Y*
10.04%

ESGV

1D
2.01%
1M
2.85%
YTD
10.76%
6M
11.56%
1Y
28.06%
3Y*
21.07%
5Y*
12.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQLT vs. ESGV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IQLT
iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF
10.27%25.42%1.54%18.73%-15.22%12.94%12.48%28.18%-11.28%
ESGV
Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF
10.76%16.48%24.69%30.79%-24.04%26.55%25.69%33.36%-14.45%

Correlation

The correlation between IQLT and ESGV is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2018

0.78

The correlation between IQLT and ESGV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

IQLT vs. ESGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IQLT
ESGV

Financial Services

24.9%
12.3%

Industrials

17.8%
4.5%

Technology

11.8%
39.5%

Healthcare

9.2%
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

8.2%
12.2%

Basic Materials

7.2%
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

6.4%
3.9%

Energy

5.6%
0.1%

Utilities

3.7%
0.2%

Communication Services

3.2%
13.0%

Real Estate

1.5%
2.8%

Financial Services

IQLT
24.9%
ESGV
12.3%

Industrials

IQLT
17.8%
ESGV
4.5%

Technology

IQLT
11.8%
ESGV
39.5%

Healthcare

IQLT
9.2%
ESGV
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

IQLT
8.2%
ESGV
12.2%

Basic Materials

IQLT
7.2%
ESGV
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

IQLT
6.4%
ESGV
3.9%

Energy

IQLT
5.6%
ESGV
0.1%

Utilities

IQLT
3.7%
ESGV
0.2%

Communication Services

IQLT
3.2%
ESGV
13.0%

Real Estate

IQLT
1.5%
ESGV
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQLT vs. ESGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQLT
IQLT Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
IQLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQLT Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
IQLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQLT Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

ESGV
ESGV Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
ESGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGV Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGV Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQLT vs. ESGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT) and Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IQLTESGVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.36

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

2.43

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.90

10.21

-3.31

IQLT vs. ESGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQLT Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is lower than the ESGV Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQLT and ESGV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IQLT vs. ESGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQLT drawdown since its inception was -32.21%, roughly equal to the maximum ESGV drawdown of -33.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQLT and ESGV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQLTESGVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.21%

-33.66%

+1.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.38%

-11.60%

+1.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.18%

-20.41%

+7.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.24%

-28.81%

-1.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.87%

+0.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.21%

-6.41%

+0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

2.75%

-0.02%

Volatility

IQLT vs. ESGV - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT) and Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV) have volatilities of 5.39% and 5.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQLTESGVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.39%

5.34%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.71%

11.13%

+1.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.96%

13.99%

+0.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.56%

18.45%

-1.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.98%

20.60%

-3.62%

IQLT vs. ESGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQLT has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than ESGV's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQLT vs. ESGV - Dividend Comparison

IQLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, more than ESGV's 0.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESGV
Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF
0.85%0.91%1.04%1.16%1.42%0.95%1.11%1.27%0.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IQLT
iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF
3.65%2.33%2.87%2.27%3.14%2.24%1.61%2.28%2.72%2.36%2.91%2.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


IQLT and ESGV have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IQLT has higher volatility (5.39%) compared to ESGV (5.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQLT dropped -32.21% vs ESGV's -33.66%.

On 5-year performance, ESGV leads with 12.57% vs 7.47% for IQLT. On fees, ESGV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ESGV has performed better with a 12.57% return vs 7.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ESGV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IQLT.

IQLT has the higher dividend yield at 3.65%, compared with 0.85% for ESGV.

IQLT is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while ESGV is Large Cap Blend Equities. IQLT tracks MSCI World ex USA Sector Neutral Quality Index (Net), while ESGV tracks FTSE US All Cap Choice Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IQLT and 0.09% for ESGV.

ESGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQLT and ESGV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer