PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IQD.TO vs. XDU.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IQD.TO vs. XDU.TO

Last updated Jul 1, 2026
See Documentation

IQD.TO (CI International Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF) and XDU.TO (iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IQD.TO is a Dividend fund managed by CI, while XDU.TO is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Market TR CAD. Over the past 5 years, IQD.TO returned 6.87%/yr vs 9.60%/yr for XDU.TO. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

IQD.TO vs. XDU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI International Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF (IQD.TO) and iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQD.TO achieves a 8.20% return, which is significantly lower than XDU.TO's 14.84% return.

IQD.TO

1D
0.23%
1M
2.60%
YTD
8.20%
6M
7.85%
1Y
16.35%
3Y*
10.30%
5Y*
6.87%
10Y*
—

XDU.TO

1D
-0.46%
1M
3.61%
YTD
14.84%
6M
14.28%
1Y
18.75%
3Y*
12.38%
5Y*
9.60%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQD.TO vs. XDU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IQD.TO
CI International Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF		8.20%12.84%4.33%18.05%-12.63%18.47%9.12%30.79%-12.87%5.00%
XDU.TO
iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF		14.84%2.51%14.32%3.75%-3.70%28.08%-0.76%15.98%4.69%4.44%

Correlation

The correlation between IQD.TO and XDU.TO is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2017

0.33

The correlation between IQD.TO and XDU.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (all time) to 0.47 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

CI International Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF

iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF

Often compared with XDU.TO:
XDU.TO vs. XDG.TOXDU.TO vs. SCHDXDU.TO vs. XDIV.TOXDU.TO vs. XHD.TOXDU.TO vs. XUS.TOXDU.TO vs. VFV.TOXDU.TO vs. ZDY.TO

Return for Risk

IQD.TO vs. XDU.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IQD.TO
IQD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
IQD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
IQD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
XDU.TO
XDU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
XDU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
XDU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQD.TO vs. XDU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI International Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF (IQD.TO) and iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

IQD.TOXDU.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.14
1.76

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.72
2.43

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.32

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.59

3.07

-1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.68

9.12

-3.44

IQD.TO vs. XDU.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQD.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the XDU.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQD.TO and XDU.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IQD.TO vs. XDU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQD.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.69%, which is greater than XDU.TO's maximum drawdown of -28.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQD.TO and XDU.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IQD.TOXDU.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.69%

-28.56%

-2.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.31%

-6.13%

-4.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.94%

-16.67%

-2.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.52%

-16.67%

-3.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

-0.51%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.13%

-5.98%

+1.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

2.06%

+0.82%

Volatility

IQD.TO vs. XDU.TO - Volatility Comparison

CI International Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF (IQD.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.32% compared to iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDU.TO) at 1.87%. This indicates that IQD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IQD.TOXDU.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.32%

1.87%

+2.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.53%

7.23%

+5.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.42%

10.70%

+3.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.20%

18.85%

-3.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.41%

28.98%

-13.57%

Dividends

IQD.TO vs. XDU.TO - Dividend Comparison

IQD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, more than XDU.TO's 2.24% yield.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
IQD.TO
CI International Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF		2.37%3.08%1.38%1.66%4.21%2.19%1.24%1.79%2.10%1.12%0.48%
XDU.TO
iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF		2.24%2.54%2.31%2.53%2.25%2.13%2.99%2.54%2.49%1.39%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

IQD.TO and XDU.TO have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IQD.TO is categorized as Dividend, while XDU.TO is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: CI and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQD.TO and XDU.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer