PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IPRV.L vs. XLFQ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IPRV.L vs. XLFQ.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IPRV.L (iShares Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and XLFQ.L (Invesco US Financials Sector UCITS ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - IPRV.L tracks the S&P Listed Private Equity Index while XLFQ.L tracks the MSCI World/Financials NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IPRV.L returned 12.65%/yr vs 13.02%/yr for XLFQ.L. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IPRV.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLFQ.L.

Performance

IPRV.L vs. XLFQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IPRV.L) and Invesco US Financials Sector UCITS ETF (XLFQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPRV.L achieves a -12.08% return, which is significantly lower than XLFQ.L's -4.71% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IPRV.L having a 12.65% annualized return and XLFQ.L not far ahead at 13.02%.

IPRV.L

1D
2.62%
1M
-2.90%
YTD
-12.08%
6M
-10.54%
1Y
-7.71%
3Y*
10.33%
5Y*
6.33%
10Y*
12.65%

XLFQ.L

1D
3.26%
1M
2.31%
YTD
-4.71%
6M
-2.62%
1Y
4.63%
3Y*
15.45%
5Y*
9.10%
10Y*
13.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPRV.L vs. XLFQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IPRV.L
iShares Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		-12.08%-4.65%26.96%32.91%-19.32%45.11%2.39%40.72%-7.63%15.66%
XLFQ.L
Invesco US Financials Sector UCITS ETF		-4.71%7.07%32.15%6.12%-0.39%37.90%-6.56%27.16%-9.51%11.87%

Correlation

The correlation between IPRV.L and XLFQ.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2013

0.71

The correlation between IPRV.L and XLFQ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

IPRV.L vs. XLFQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IPRV.L
XLFQ.L

Financial Services

99.0%
98.0%

Industrials

0.7%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

0.3%

-

Technology

0.1%
1.7%

Healthcare

0.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Energy

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

IPRV.L
99.0%
XLFQ.L
98.0%

Industrials

IPRV.L
0.7%
XLFQ.L
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

IPRV.L
0.3%
XLFQ.L

-

Technology

IPRV.L
0.1%
XLFQ.L
1.7%

Healthcare

IPRV.L
0.0%
XLFQ.L

-

Consumer Defensive

IPRV.L
0.0%
XLFQ.L

-

Basic Materials

IPRV.L

-

XLFQ.L

-

Communication Services

IPRV.L

-

XLFQ.L

-

Energy

IPRV.L

-

XLFQ.L

-

Real Estate

IPRV.L

-

XLFQ.L

-

Utilities

IPRV.L

-

XLFQ.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF USD (Dist)

Invesco US Financials Sector UCITS ETF

Often compared with IPRV.L:
IPRV.L vs. SPYIPRV.L vs. QQQ3.LIPRV.L vs. IWMO.LIPRV.L vs. BRK-BIPRV.L vs. BXIPRV.L vs. SWDA.LIPRV.L vs. HMWO.L
Often compared with XLFQ.L:
XLFQ.L vs. XLFXLFQ.L vs. XDWF.DEXLFQ.L vs. UIFS.LXLFQ.L vs. SEIVXLFQ.L vs. FINW.LXLFQ.L vs. XWFS.LXLFQ.L vs. VOO

Return for Risk

IPRV.L vs. XLFQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IPRV.L
IPRV.L Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
IPRV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPRV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPRV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
IPRV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPRV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
XLFQ.L
XLFQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
XLFQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLFQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLFQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
XLFQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLFQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPRV.L vs. XLFQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IPRV.L) and Invesco US Financials Sector UCITS ETF (XLFQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

IPRV.LXLFQ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-0.41
0.33

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
-0.45
0.57

-1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.07

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.33

0.36

-0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.69

0.84

-1.54

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IPRV.L vs. XLFQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPRV.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.41, which is lower than the XLFQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPRV.L and XLFQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

IPRV.LXLFQ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.41

0.33

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.52

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.65

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.64

-0.48

Drawdowns

IPRV.L vs. XLFQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPRV.L drawdown since its inception was -74.08%, which is greater than XLFQ.L's maximum drawdown of -35.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPRV.L and XLFQ.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IPRV.LXLFQ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.08%

-35.39%

-38.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.47%

-12.81%

-10.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.90%

-19.01%

-8.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.90%

-19.01%

-8.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.53%

-35.39%

-9.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.45%

-6.62%

-15.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.64%

-5.65%

-5.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.08%

5.48%

+5.60%

Volatility

IPRV.L vs. XLFQ.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IPRV.L) has a higher volatility of 5.75% compared to Invesco US Financials Sector UCITS ETF (XLFQ.L) at 4.46%. This indicates that IPRV.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLFQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IPRV.LXLFQ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.75%

4.46%

+1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.11%

10.48%

+4.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.90%

13.91%

+4.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.52%

17.52%

+2.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.36%

20.14%

+0.22%

IPRV.L vs. XLFQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPRV.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XLFQ.L's 0.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

IPRV.L vs. XLFQ.L - Dividend Comparison

IPRV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.23%, while XLFQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IPRV.L
iShares Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		5.23%3.98%3.81%4.27%5.26%3.42%4.85%4.28%6.46%6.70%5.33%8.21%
XLFQ.L
Invesco US Financials Sector UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

IPRV.L and XLFQ.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLFQ.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLFQ.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for IPRV.L.

IPRV.L tracks S&P Listed Private Equity Index, while XLFQ.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for IPRV.L and 0.14% for XLFQ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IPRV.L and XLFQ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer