PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IPRV.L vs. PSP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IPRV.L vs. PSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IPRV.L) and Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IPRV.L is traded in GBp, while PSP is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PSP values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPRV.L achieves a -12.08% return, which is significantly lower than PSP's -11.15% return. Over the past 10 years, IPRV.L has outperformed PSP with an annualized return of 12.65%, while PSP has yielded a comparatively lower 8.51% annualized return.


IPRV.L

1D
2.62%
1M
-2.90%
YTD
-12.08%
6M
-10.54%
1Y
-7.71%
3Y*
10.33%
5Y*
6.33%
10Y*
12.65%

PSP

1D
2.30%
1M
-3.37%
YTD
-11.15%
6M
-9.67%
1Y
-5.29%
3Y*
8.21%
5Y*
1.42%
10Y*
8.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPRV.L vs. PSP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IPRV.L
iShares Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
-12.08%-4.65%26.96%32.91%-19.32%45.11%2.39%40.72%-7.63%15.66%
PSP
Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF
-11.15%-1.10%19.47%30.83%-29.93%28.51%9.17%30.57%-10.09%13.40%

Correlation

The correlation between IPRV.L and PSP is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2007

0.57

The correlation between IPRV.L and PSP shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (all time) to 0.74 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IPRV.L vs. PSP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IPRV.L
PSP

Financial Services

99.0%
90.7%

Industrials

0.7%
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

0.3%

-

Technology

0.1%
0.1%

Healthcare

0.0%
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

0.0%
5.4%

Basic Materials

-

0.1%

Communication Services

-

1.0%

Energy

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

IPRV.L
99.0%
PSP
90.7%

Industrials

IPRV.L
0.7%
PSP
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

IPRV.L
0.3%
PSP

-

Technology

IPRV.L
0.1%
PSP
0.1%

Healthcare

IPRV.L
0.0%
PSP
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

IPRV.L
0.0%
PSP
5.4%

Basic Materials

IPRV.L

-

PSP
0.1%

Communication Services

IPRV.L

-

PSP
1.0%

Energy

IPRV.L

-

PSP

-

Real Estate

IPRV.L

-

PSP

-

Utilities

IPRV.L

-

PSP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IPRV.L vs. PSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPRV.L
IPRV.L Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
IPRV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPRV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPRV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
IPRV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPRV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

PSP
PSP Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
PSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSP Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
PSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSP Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPRV.L vs. PSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IPRV.L) and Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IPRV.LPSPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

0.97

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.33

-0.25

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.69

-0.56

-0.13

IPRV.L vs. PSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPRV.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.41, which is lower than the PSP Sharpe Ratio of -0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPRV.L and PSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IPRV.LPSPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.41

-0.28

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.07

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.42

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.16

0.00

Drawdowns

IPRV.L vs. PSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPRV.L drawdown since its inception was -74.08%, smaller than the maximum PSP drawdown of -78.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPRV.L and PSP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IPRV.LPSPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.08%

-78.06%

+3.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.47%

-21.46%

-2.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.90%

-25.46%

-2.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.90%

-36.11%

+8.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.53%

-40.70%

-3.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.45%

-19.04%

-3.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.64%

-21.36%

+9.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.08%

9.46%

+1.62%

Volatility

IPRV.L vs. PSP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IPRV.L) is 5.75%, while Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) has a volatility of 6.52%. This indicates that IPRV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IPRV.LPSPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.75%

6.52%

-0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.11%

15.44%

-0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.90%

18.84%

+0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.52%

21.17%

-1.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.36%

20.46%

-0.10%

IPRV.L vs. PSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPRV.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than PSP's 1.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

IPRV.L vs. PSP - Dividend Comparison

IPRV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.23%, less than PSP's 6.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IPRV.L
iShares Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
5.23%3.98%3.81%4.27%5.26%3.42%4.85%4.28%6.46%6.70%5.33%8.21%
PSP
Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF
6.53%5.87%8.62%3.96%2.88%10.34%4.66%5.87%6.81%10.18%4.12%6.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


IPRV.L and PSP have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IPRV.L is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IPRV.L is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.44% for PSP.

IPRV.L is categorized as Financials Equities, while PSP is Global Equities. IPRV.L tracks S&P Listed Private Equity Index, while PSP tracks Red Rocks Global Listed Private Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for IPRV.L and 1.44% for PSP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IPRV.L and PSP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer