PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IPRV.L vs. PEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IPRV.L vs. PEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IPRV.L) and ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IPRV.L is traded in GBp, while PEX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PEX values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPRV.L achieves a -12.08% return, which is significantly lower than PEX's -10.35% return. Over the past 10 years, IPRV.L has outperformed PEX with an annualized return of 12.65%, while PEX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.06% annualized return.


IPRV.L

1D
2.62%
1M
-2.90%
YTD
-12.08%
6M
-10.54%
1Y
-7.71%
3Y*
10.33%
5Y*
6.33%
10Y*
12.65%

PEX

1D
2.01%
1M
-3.56%
YTD
-10.35%
6M
-10.27%
1Y
-10.57%
3Y*
1.66%
5Y*
0.35%
10Y*
5.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPRV.L vs. PEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IPRV.L
iShares Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
-12.08%-4.65%26.96%32.91%-19.32%45.11%2.39%40.72%-7.63%15.66%
PEX
ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF
-10.35%-6.93%15.03%16.96%-17.18%29.56%-4.05%20.76%-8.17%4.44%

Correlation

The correlation between IPRV.L and PEX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2013

0.61

The correlation between IPRV.L and PEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

IPRV.L vs. PEX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IPRV.L
PEX

Financial Services

99.0%
96.7%

Industrials

0.7%
1.5%

Consumer Cyclical

0.3%

-

Technology

0.1%

-

Healthcare

0.0%
1.5%

Consumer Defensive

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

0.4%

Communication Services

-

-

Energy

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

IPRV.L
99.0%
PEX
96.7%

Industrials

IPRV.L
0.7%
PEX
1.5%

Consumer Cyclical

IPRV.L
0.3%
PEX

-

Technology

IPRV.L
0.1%
PEX

-

Healthcare

IPRV.L
0.0%
PEX
1.5%

Consumer Defensive

IPRV.L
0.0%
PEX

-

Basic Materials

IPRV.L

-

PEX
0.4%

Communication Services

IPRV.L

-

PEX

-

Energy

IPRV.L

-

PEX

-

Real Estate

IPRV.L

-

PEX

-

Utilities

IPRV.L

-

PEX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IPRV.L vs. PEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPRV.L
IPRV.L Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
IPRV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPRV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPRV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
IPRV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPRV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

PEX
PEX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
PEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
PEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPRV.L vs. PEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IPRV.L) and ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IPRV.LPEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

0.89

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.33

-0.46

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.69

-0.93

+0.23

IPRV.L vs. PEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPRV.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.41, which is higher than the PEX Sharpe Ratio of -0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPRV.L and PEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IPRV.LPEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.41

-0.72

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.02

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.28

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.33

-0.17

Drawdowns

IPRV.L vs. PEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPRV.L drawdown since its inception was -74.08%, which is greater than PEX's maximum drawdown of -43.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPRV.L and PEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IPRV.LPEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.08%

-43.18%

-30.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.47%

-22.91%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.90%

-25.43%

-2.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.90%

-25.43%

-2.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.53%

-43.18%

-1.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.45%

-21.00%

-1.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.64%

-7.16%

-4.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.08%

11.42%

-0.34%

Volatility

IPRV.L vs. PEX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IPRV.L) has a higher volatility of 5.75% compared to ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PEX) at 4.87%. This indicates that IPRV.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IPRV.LPEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.75%

4.87%

+0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.11%

12.29%

+2.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.90%

14.84%

+4.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.52%

15.83%

+3.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.36%

17.81%

+2.55%

IPRV.L vs. PEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPRV.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than PEX's 3.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

IPRV.L vs. PEX - Dividend Comparison

IPRV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.23%, less than PEX's 12.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IPRV.L
iShares Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
5.23%3.98%3.81%4.27%5.26%3.42%4.85%4.28%6.46%6.70%5.33%8.21%
PEX
ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF
12.56%12.80%14.11%13.02%1.77%13.64%5.52%7.94%4.72%24.26%3.24%12.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


IPRV.L and PEX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IPRV.L is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IPRV.L is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 3.13% for PEX.

IPRV.L tracks S&P Listed Private Equity Index, while PEX tracks LPX Direct Listed Private Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for IPRV.L and 3.13% for PEX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IPRV.L and PEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer