PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IPRP.L vs. SEMA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IPRP.L vs. SEMA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF (IPRP.L) and iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (SEMA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPRP.L achieves a -0.45% return, which is significantly lower than SEMA.L's 26.04% return. Over the past 10 years, IPRP.L has underperformed SEMA.L with an annualized return of 1.98%, while SEMA.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.90% annualized return.


IPRP.L

1D
0.61%
1M
-1.16%
YTD
-0.45%
6M
0.27%
1Y
1.71%
3Y*
11.51%
5Y*
-3.55%
10Y*
1.98%

SEMA.L

1D
-1.41%
1M
6.37%
YTD
26.04%
6M
28.18%
1Y
53.95%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
8.58%
10Y*
10.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPRP.L vs. SEMA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IPRP.L
iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF
-0.45%14.18%-4.49%16.04%-33.34%2.23%-3.56%18.93%-4.97%19.62%
SEMA.L
iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc)
26.04%25.09%9.38%3.47%-10.74%-1.60%14.69%12.62%-9.25%24.43%

Correlation

The correlation between IPRP.L and SEMA.L is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2009

0.42

Over the past year, the correlation between IPRP.L and SEMA.L has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IPRP.L vs. SEMA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IPRP.L
SEMA.L

Real Estate

100.0%
1.1%

Basic Materials

-

6.0%

Communication Services

-

6.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.8%

Energy

-

3.6%

Financial Services

-

18.2%

Healthcare

-

2.7%

Industrials

-

7.0%

Technology

-

41.3%

Utilities

-

2.0%

Real Estate

IPRP.L
100.0%
SEMA.L
1.1%

Basic Materials

IPRP.L

-

SEMA.L
6.0%

Communication Services

IPRP.L

-

SEMA.L
6.4%

Consumer Cyclical

IPRP.L

-

SEMA.L
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

IPRP.L

-

SEMA.L
2.8%

Energy

IPRP.L

-

SEMA.L
3.6%

Financial Services

IPRP.L

-

SEMA.L
18.2%

Healthcare

IPRP.L

-

SEMA.L
2.7%

Industrials

IPRP.L

-

SEMA.L
7.0%

Technology

IPRP.L

-

SEMA.L
41.3%

Utilities

IPRP.L

-

SEMA.L
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IPRP.L vs. SEMA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPRP.L
IPRP.L Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
IPRP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPRP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPRP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
IPRP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPRP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

SEMA.L
SEMA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
SEMA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEMA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEMA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
SEMA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEMA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPRP.L vs. SEMA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF (IPRP.L) and iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (SEMA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IPRP.LSEMA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.59

-0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.11

4.90

-4.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.29

17.45

-17.17

IPRP.L vs. SEMA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPRP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is lower than the SEMA.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPRP.L and SEMA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IPRP.LSEMA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

3.16

-3.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.16

0.53

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

0.61

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.40

-0.17

Drawdowns

IPRP.L vs. SEMA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPRP.L drawdown since its inception was -59.70%, which is greater than SEMA.L's maximum drawdown of -31.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPRP.L and SEMA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IPRP.LSEMA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.70%

-31.75%

-27.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.11%

-10.95%

-5.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.11%

-15.23%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.44%

-23.52%

-24.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.44%

-27.06%

-21.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.85%

-2.37%

-20.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.69%

-10.72%

-3.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.93%

3.08%

+2.85%

Volatility

IPRP.L vs. SEMA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF (IPRP.L) is 4.48%, while iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (SEMA.L) has a volatility of 7.29%. This indicates that IPRP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEMA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IPRP.LSEMA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.48%

7.29%

-2.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.02%

14.56%

-1.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.13%

17.00%

-1.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.51%

16.21%

+5.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.32%

18.05%

+1.27%

IPRP.L vs. SEMA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPRP.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SEMA.L's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

IPRP.L vs. SEMA.L - Dividend Comparison

IPRP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, while SEMA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IPRP.L
iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF
3.34%3.32%3.30%3.05%4.90%2.47%2.96%3.46%3.70%3.20%3.07%3.60%
SEMA.L
iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IPRP.L and SEMA.L have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SEMA.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SEMA.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IPRP.L.

IPRP.L is categorized as REIT, while SEMA.L is Emerging Markets Equities. IPRP.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe TR EUR, while SEMA.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IPRP.L and 0.18% for SEMA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IPRP.L and SEMA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer