IPRP.L vs. LOGS.DE
IPRP.L (iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF) and LOGS.DE (Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - IPRP.L is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe TR EUR, while LOGS.DE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the STOXX® Europe 600 Energy ESG+. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IPRP.L returned 1.88%/yr vs 13.47%/yr for LOGS.DE. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IPRP.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for LOGS.DE.
Performance
IPRP.L vs. LOGS.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IPRP.L is traded in GBp, while LOGS.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the LOGS.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IPRP.L achieves a 0.47% return, which is significantly lower than LOGS.DE's 28.83% return. Over the past 10 years, IPRP.L has underperformed LOGS.DE with an annualized return of 1.88%, while LOGS.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 13.47% annualized return.
IPRP.L
- 1D
- 1.60%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 0.47%
- 6M
- 2.67%
- 1Y
- 1.29%
- 3Y*
- 11.51%
- 5Y*
- -4.25%
- 10Y*
- 1.88%
LOGS.DE
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- -2.65%
- YTD
- 28.83%
- 6M
- 30.19%
- 1Y
- 60.69%
- 3Y*
- 24.22%
- 5Y*
- 21.30%
- 10Y*
- 13.47%
IPRP.L vs. LOGS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPRP.L iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF | 0.47% | 13.63% | -4.96% | 15.42% | -33.74% | 1.88% | -3.84% | 18.45% | -5.36% | 19.14% |
LOGS.DE Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 28.83% | 52.01% | -6.34% | 0.15% | 36.02% | 12.53% | -17.33% | 5.46% | 0.62% | 6.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between IPRP.L and LOGS.DE is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008 | 0.33 |
The correlation between IPRP.L and LOGS.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IPRP.L vs. LOGS.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IPRP.L
LOGS.DE
IPRP.L vs. LOGS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF (IPRP.L) and Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (LOGS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IPRP.L | LOGS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.60 | -0.57 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.08 | 8.79 | -8.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.21 | 29.00 | -28.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IPRP.L vs. LOGS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IPRP.L drawdown since its inception was -64.48%, which is greater than LOGS.DE's maximum drawdown of -53.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPRP.L and LOGS.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IPRP.L | LOGS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.48% | -53.78% | -10.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.12% | -6.87% | -9.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.12% | -19.72% | +3.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.77% | -19.72% | -29.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.77% | -53.78% | +5.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.83% | -5.53% | -18.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.67% | -17.58% | +0.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.28% | 2.09% | +4.19% |
Volatility
IPRP.L vs. LOGS.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF (IPRP.L) is 4.23%, while Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (LOGS.DE) has a volatility of 6.05%. This indicates that IPRP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LOGS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IPRP.L | LOGS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.23% | 6.05% | -1.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.05% | 13.40% | -0.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.28% | 17.33% | -2.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.53% | 21.36% | +0.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.35% | 23.53% | -4.18% |
IPRP.L vs. LOGS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IPRP.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than LOGS.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
IPRP.L vs. LOGS.DE - Dividend Comparison
IPRP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, while LOGS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPRP.L iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF | 0.50% | 2.83% | 2.79% | 2.62% | 4.20% | 2.11% | 2.68% | 3.07% | 3.24% | 2.81% | 2.49% | 2.59% |
LOGS.DE Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IPRP.L and LOGS.DE have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LOGS.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LOGS.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IPRP.L.
IPRP.L is categorized as REIT, while LOGS.DE is Energy Equities. IPRP.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe TR EUR, while LOGS.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Energy ESG+. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IPRP.L and 0.30% for LOGS.DE.
Find the right allocation for IPRP.L and LOGS.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer