PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IPRP.L vs. IWDA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IPRP.L vs. IWDA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF (IPRP.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IPRP.L is traded in GBp, while IWDA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IWDA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPRP.L achieves a -1.05% return, which is significantly lower than IWDA.L's 10.12% return. Over the past 10 years, IPRP.L has underperformed IWDA.L with an annualized return of 2.01%, while IWDA.L has yielded a comparatively higher 14.05% annualized return.


IPRP.L

1D
-1.58%
1M
-3.53%
YTD
-1.05%
6M
-0.53%
1Y
0.82%
3Y*
11.59%
5Y*
-3.66%
10Y*
2.01%

IWDA.L

1D
-0.27%
1M
4.87%
YTD
10.12%
6M
10.50%
1Y
27.28%
3Y*
17.82%
5Y*
13.03%
10Y*
14.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPRP.L vs. IWDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IPRP.L
iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF
-1.05%14.18%-4.49%16.04%-33.34%2.23%-3.56%18.93%-4.97%19.62%
IWDA.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
10.12%12.41%21.19%18.05%-8.38%23.34%12.65%22.29%-3.62%12.15%

Correlation

The correlation between IPRP.L and IWDA.L is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2010

0.46

The correlation between IPRP.L and IWDA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IPRP.L vs. IWDA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IPRP.L
IWDA.L

Real Estate

100.0%
1.2%

Basic Materials

-

2.8%

Communication Services

-

9.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.8%

Energy

-

3.9%

Financial Services

-

14.9%

Healthcare

-

8.6%

Industrials

-

9.7%

Technology

-

32.9%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Real Estate

IPRP.L
100.0%
IWDA.L
1.2%

Basic Materials

IPRP.L

-

IWDA.L
2.8%

Communication Services

IPRP.L

-

IWDA.L
9.3%

Consumer Cyclical

IPRP.L

-

IWDA.L
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

IPRP.L

-

IWDA.L
4.8%

Energy

IPRP.L

-

IWDA.L
3.9%

Financial Services

IPRP.L

-

IWDA.L
14.9%

Healthcare

IPRP.L

-

IWDA.L
8.6%

Industrials

IPRP.L

-

IWDA.L
9.7%

Technology

IPRP.L

-

IWDA.L
32.9%

Utilities

IPRP.L

-

IWDA.L
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IPRP.L vs. IWDA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPRP.L
IPRP.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
IPRP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPRP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPRP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
IPRP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPRP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

IWDA.L
IWDA.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
IWDA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWDA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWDA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
IWDA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWDA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPRP.L vs. IWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF (IPRP.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IPRP.LIWDA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.44

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.05

4.26

-4.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.14

16.05

-15.91

IPRP.L vs. IWDA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPRP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is lower than the IWDA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPRP.L and IWDA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IPRP.LIWDA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

2.34

-2.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

0.90

-1.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

0.90

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.86

-0.64

Drawdowns

IPRP.L vs. IWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPRP.L drawdown since its inception was -59.70%, which is greater than IWDA.L's maximum drawdown of -26.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPRP.L and IWDA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IPRP.LIWDA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.70%

-26.18%

-33.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.11%

-6.37%

-9.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.11%

-18.91%

+2.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.44%

-18.91%

-29.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.44%

-26.18%

-22.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.32%

-0.27%

-23.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.68%

-3.39%

-11.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.87%

1.70%

+4.17%

Volatility

IPRP.L vs. IWDA.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF (IPRP.L) has a higher volatility of 4.76% compared to iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L) at 3.47%. This indicates that IPRP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IPRP.LIWDA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.76%

3.47%

+1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.02%

8.85%

+4.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.13%

11.65%

+3.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.51%

14.49%

+7.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.33%

15.51%

+3.82%

IPRP.L vs. IWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPRP.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IWDA.L's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

IPRP.L vs. IWDA.L - Dividend Comparison

IPRP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, while IWDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IPRP.L
iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF
3.36%3.32%3.30%3.05%4.90%2.47%2.96%3.46%3.70%3.20%3.07%3.60%
IWDA.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IPRP.L and IWDA.L have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IWDA.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IWDA.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IPRP.L.

IPRP.L is categorized as REIT, while IWDA.L is Global Equities. IPRP.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe TR EUR, while IWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IPRP.L and 0.20% for IWDA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IPRP.L and IWDA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer