IPRP.L vs. EWT
IPRP.L (iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF) and EWT (iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IPRP.L is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe TR EUR, while EWT is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Taiwan Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IPRP.L returned 1.88%/yr vs 20.18%/yr for EWT. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IPRP.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for EWT.
Performance
IPRP.L vs. EWT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IPRP.L is traded in GBp, while EWT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EWT values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IPRP.L achieves a 0.47% return, which is significantly lower than EWT's 62.35% return. Over the past 10 years, IPRP.L has underperformed EWT with an annualized return of 1.88%, while EWT has yielded a comparatively higher 20.18% annualized return.
IPRP.L
- 1D
- 1.60%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 0.47%
- 6M
- 2.67%
- 1Y
- 1.29%
- 3Y*
- 11.51%
- 5Y*
- -4.25%
- 10Y*
- 1.88%
EWT
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 9.13%
- YTD
- 62.35%
- 6M
- 67.03%
- 1Y
- 92.17%
- 3Y*
- 32.26%
- 5Y*
- 18.70%
- 10Y*
- 20.18%
IPRP.L vs. EWT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPRP.L iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF | 0.47% | 13.63% | -4.96% | 15.42% | -33.74% | 1.88% | -3.84% | 18.45% | -5.36% | 19.14% |
EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 62.35% | 19.23% | 18.14% | 17.77% | -20.44% | 27.38% | 27.64% | 28.29% | -4.56% | 15.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between IPRP.L and EWT is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2007 | 0.29 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IPRP.L and EWT has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.29, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IPRP.L vs. EWT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IPRP.L
EWT
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
IPRP.L
EWT
-
Basic Materials
IPRP.L
-
EWT
Communication Services
IPRP.L
-
EWT
Consumer Cyclical
IPRP.L
-
EWT
Consumer Defensive
IPRP.L
-
EWT
Energy
IPRP.L
-
EWT
-
Financial Services
IPRP.L
-
EWT
Healthcare
IPRP.L
-
EWT
Industrials
IPRP.L
-
EWT
Technology
IPRP.L
-
EWT
Utilities
IPRP.L
-
EWT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IPRP.L vs. EWT — Risk / Return Rank
IPRP.L
EWT
IPRP.L vs. EWT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF (IPRP.L) and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IPRP.L | EWT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.65 | -0.62 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.08 | 10.53 | -10.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.21 | 29.10 | -28.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IPRP.L vs. EWT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IPRP.L drawdown since its inception was -64.48%, which is greater than EWT's maximum drawdown of -49.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPRP.L and EWT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IPRP.L | EWT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.48% | -49.31% | -15.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.12% | -8.80% | -7.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.12% | -26.08% | +9.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.77% | -28.99% | -19.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.77% | -28.99% | -19.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.83% | -3.90% | -19.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.67% | -9.17% | -7.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.28% | 3.18% | +3.10% |
Volatility
IPRP.L vs. EWT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF (IPRP.L) is 4.23%, while iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) has a volatility of 12.82%. This indicates that IPRP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IPRP.L | EWT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.23% | 12.82% | -8.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.05% | 20.61% | -7.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.28% | 24.60% | -9.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.53% | 20.87% | +0.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.35% | 20.77% | -1.42% |
IPRP.L vs. EWT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IPRP.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than EWT's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
IPRP.L vs. EWT - Dividend Comparison
IPRP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than EWT's 2.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 2.74% | 4.43% | 3.32% | 8.12% | 18.82% | 0.55% | 1.83% | 2.49% | 3.16% | 2.81% | 2.39% | 3.12% |
IPRP.L iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF | 0.50% | 2.83% | 2.79% | 2.62% | 4.20% | 2.11% | 2.68% | 3.07% | 3.24% | 2.81% | 2.49% | 2.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IPRP.L and EWT have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IPRP.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IPRP.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWT.
IPRP.L is categorized as REIT, while EWT is Asia Pacific Equities. IPRP.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe TR EUR, while EWT tracks MSCI Taiwan Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IPRP.L and 0.59% for EWT.
Find the right allocation for IPRP.L and EWT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer