PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IPRP.L vs. EWT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IPRP.L vs. EWT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF (IPRP.L) and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IPRP.L is traded in GBp, while EWT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EWT values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPRP.L achieves a 0.47% return, which is significantly lower than EWT's 62.35% return. Over the past 10 years, IPRP.L has underperformed EWT with an annualized return of 1.88%, while EWT has yielded a comparatively higher 20.18% annualized return.


IPRP.L

1D
1.60%
1M
0.26%
YTD
0.47%
6M
2.67%
1Y
1.29%
3Y*
11.51%
5Y*
-4.25%
10Y*
1.88%

EWT

1D
0.25%
1M
9.13%
YTD
62.35%
6M
67.03%
1Y
92.17%
3Y*
32.26%
5Y*
18.70%
10Y*
20.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPRP.L vs. EWT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IPRP.L
iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF
0.47%13.63%-4.96%15.42%-33.74%1.88%-3.84%18.45%-5.36%19.14%
EWT
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
62.35%19.23%18.14%17.77%-20.44%27.38%27.64%28.29%-4.56%15.85%

Correlation

The correlation between IPRP.L and EWT is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2007

0.29

Over the past year, the correlation between IPRP.L and EWT has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.29, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IPRP.L vs. EWT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IPRP.L
EWT

Real Estate

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

3.5%

Communication Services

-

1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

-

1.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.1%

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

13.0%

Healthcare

-

0.8%

Industrials

-

4.9%

Technology

-

72.9%

Utilities

-

-

Real Estate

IPRP.L
100.0%
EWT

-

Basic Materials

IPRP.L

-

EWT
3.5%

Communication Services

IPRP.L

-

EWT
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

IPRP.L

-

EWT
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

IPRP.L

-

EWT
1.1%

Energy

IPRP.L

-

EWT

-

Financial Services

IPRP.L

-

EWT
13.0%

Healthcare

IPRP.L

-

EWT
0.8%

Industrials

IPRP.L

-

EWT
4.9%

Technology

IPRP.L

-

EWT
72.9%

Utilities

IPRP.L

-

EWT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IPRP.L vs. EWT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPRP.L
IPRP.L Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
IPRP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPRP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPRP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
IPRP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPRP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

EWT
EWT Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
EWT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWT Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
EWT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPRP.L vs. EWT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF (IPRP.L) and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IPRP.LEWTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.65

-0.62

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.08

10.53

-10.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.21

29.10

-28.89

IPRP.L vs. EWT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPRP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.08, which is lower than the EWT Sharpe Ratio of 3.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPRP.L and EWT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IPRP.L vs. EWT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPRP.L drawdown since its inception was -64.48%, which is greater than EWT's maximum drawdown of -49.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPRP.L and EWT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IPRP.LEWTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.48%

-49.31%

-15.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.12%

-8.80%

-7.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.12%

-26.08%

+9.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.77%

-28.99%

-19.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.77%

-28.99%

-19.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.83%

-3.90%

-19.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.67%

-9.17%

-7.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.28%

3.18%

+3.10%

Volatility

IPRP.L vs. EWT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF (IPRP.L) is 4.23%, while iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) has a volatility of 12.82%. This indicates that IPRP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IPRP.LEWTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.23%

12.82%

-8.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.05%

20.61%

-7.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.28%

24.60%

-9.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.53%

20.87%

+0.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.35%

20.77%

-1.42%

IPRP.L vs. EWT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPRP.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than EWT's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

IPRP.L vs. EWT - Dividend Comparison

IPRP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than EWT's 2.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWT
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
2.74%4.43%3.32%8.12%18.82%0.55%1.83%2.49%3.16%2.81%2.39%3.12%
IPRP.L
iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF
0.50%2.83%2.79%2.62%4.20%2.11%2.68%3.07%3.24%2.81%2.49%2.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


IPRP.L and EWT have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IPRP.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IPRP.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWT.

IPRP.L is categorized as REIT, while EWT is Asia Pacific Equities. IPRP.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe TR EUR, while EWT tracks MSCI Taiwan Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IPRP.L and 0.59% for EWT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IPRP.L and EWT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer