PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IPOL.L vs. FEM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IPOL.L vs. FEM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IPOL.L) and First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Acc (FEM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IPOL.L is traded in USD, while FEM.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FEM.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPOL.L achieves a 14.81% return, which is significantly higher than FEM.L's 11.95% return. Over the past 10 years, IPOL.L has outperformed FEM.L with an annualized return of 9.64%, while FEM.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.87% annualized return.


IPOL.L

1D
-1.18%
1M
-2.95%
6M
12.69%
YTD
14.81%
1Y
30.84%
3Y*
28.08%
5Y*
14.78%
10Y*
9.64%

FEM.L

1D
-2.49%
1M
-5.08%
6M
6.58%
YTD
11.95%
1Y
26.15%
3Y*
15.04%
5Y*
6.37%
10Y*
7.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPOL.L vs. FEM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IPOL.L
iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
14.81%72.75%-6.10%49.20%-26.61%6.83%-11.21%-6.81%-12.61%54.17%
FEM.L
First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Acc
11.95%27.40%3.37%9.71%-14.08%7.73%-1.00%19.72%-16.32%39.74%

Correlation

The correlation between IPOL.L and FEM.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2013

0.56

The correlation between IPOL.L and FEM.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IPOL.L vs. FEM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPOL.L
IPOL.L Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
IPOL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPOL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPOL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
IPOL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPOL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

FEM.L
FEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPOL.L vs. FEM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IPOL.L) and First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Acc (FEM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IPOL.LFEM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.25

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

3.10

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.74

8.32

-1.58

IPOL.L vs. FEM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPOL.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is comparable to the FEM.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPOL.L and FEM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IPOL.L vs. FEM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPOL.L drawdown since its inception was -68.05%, which is greater than FEM.L's maximum drawdown of -56.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPOL.L and FEM.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IPOL.LFEM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.05%

-56.43%

-11.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.48%

-8.39%

-2.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.43%

-17.77%

-4.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.92%

-31.03%

-24.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.79%

-45.92%

-19.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.95%

-8.39%

+5.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.57%

-25.56%

-4.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.57%

3.14%

+1.43%

Volatility

IPOL.L vs. FEM.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IPOL.L) is 5.32%, while First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Acc (FEM.L) has a volatility of 7.27%. This indicates that IPOL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IPOL.LFEM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.32%

7.27%

-1.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.48%

15.35%

+4.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.82%

18.64%

+6.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.15%

18.62%

+11.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.40%

19.98%

+7.42%

IPOL.L vs. FEM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPOL.L has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than FEM.L's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

IPOL.L vs. FEM.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IPOL.L nor FEM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IPOL.L and FEM.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IPOL.L is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IPOL.L is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FEM.L.

IPOL.L tracks MSCI Emerging - Poland in Net USD, while FEM.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for IPOL.L and 0.80% for FEM.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IPOL.L and FEM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer