FEM.L vs. FEMD.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Acc (FEM.L) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Quality Income UCITS ETF (FEMD.L).

FEM.L and FEMD.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FEM.L is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on Apr 9, 2013. FEMD.L is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on Sep 9, 2019. Both FEM.L and FEMD.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

FEM.L vs. FEMD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Acc (FEM.L) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Quality Income UCITS ETF (FEMD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FEM.L vs. FEMD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FEM.L First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Acc	11.44%	18.46%	5.12%	4.21%	-3.80%	8.72%	-3.95%	2.96%
FEMD.L Fidelity Emerging Markets Quality Income UCITS ETF	6.96%	20.67%	6.74%	9.89%	-15.51%	6.86%	9.56%	2.24%

Different Trading Currencies

FEM.L is traded in GBp, while FEMD.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the FEMD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEM.L achieves a 11.44% return, which is significantly higher than FEMD.L's 6.96% return.

FEM.L

• 1D: 2.05%
• 1M: -2.65%
• YTD: 11.44%
• 6M: 14.12%
• 1Y: 30.88%
• 3Y*: 14.03%
• 5Y*: 7.63%
• 10Y*: 9.02%

FEMD.L

• 1D: 3.21%
• 1M: -4.51%
• YTD: 6.96%
• 6M: 10.40%
• 1Y: 28.92%
• 3Y*: 13.81%
• 5Y*: 5.27%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEM.L vs. FEMD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEM.L has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FEMD.L's 0.50% expense ratio.

FEM.L

First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Acc

FEMD.L

Fidelity Emerging Markets Quality Income UCITS ETF

Return for Risk

FEM.L vs. FEMD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEM.L

FEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 87
FEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
FEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 84
FEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 89

FEMD.L

FEMD.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
FEMD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FEMD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
FEMD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 87
FEMD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FEMD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEM.L vs. FEMD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Acc (FEM.L) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Quality Income UCITS ETF (FEMD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FEM.L	FEMD.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.85	1.94	-0.09
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.31	2.60	-0.29
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.37	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.45	3.30	+0.15
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.64	10.81	+1.83
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FEM.L vs. FEMD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEM.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the FEMD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEM.L and FEMD.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FEM.L	FEMD.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.85	1.94	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48	0.36	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	0.39	-0.07

Correlation

The correlation between FEM.L and FEMD.L is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FEM.L vs. FEMD.L - Dividend Comparison

FEM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FEMD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FEM.L First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FEMD.L Fidelity Emerging Markets Quality Income UCITS ETF	3.35%	3.48%	3.76%	3.69%	3.99%	3.27%	2.62%	0.37%

Drawdowns

FEM.L vs. FEMD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEM.L drawdown since its inception was -35.42%, which is greater than FEMD.L's maximum drawdown of -27.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEM.L and FEMD.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEM.L	FEMD.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.42%	-27.55%	-7.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.09%	-10.46%	-0.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.83%	-25.26%	+7.43%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.42%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.65%	-5.99%	+3.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.09%	-8.43%	-0.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.50%	2.73%	-0.23%

Volatility

FEM.L vs. FEMD.L - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Acc (FEM.L) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Quality Income UCITS ETF (FEMD.L) have volatilities of 5.83% and 5.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEM.L	FEMD.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.83%	5.92%	-0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.58%	10.65%	+1.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.63%	14.86%	+1.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.89%	14.44%	+1.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.71%	17.39%	+1.32%