PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IPOAX vs. FQEMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IPOAX vs. FQEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Delaware Ivy Systematic Emerging Markets Equity Fund (IPOAX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM (FQEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPOAX achieves a 29.30% return, which is significantly lower than FQEMX's 90.54% return.


IPOAX

1D
2.66%
1M
7.04%
YTD
29.30%
6M
32.17%
1Y
48.61%
3Y*
21.10%
5Y*
5.05%
10Y*
10.67%

FQEMX

1D
5.64%
1M
15.69%
YTD
90.54%
6M
99.18%
1Y
155.84%
3Y*
47.88%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPOAX vs. FQEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IPOAX
Delaware Ivy Systematic Emerging Markets Equity Fund
29.30%26.53%7.71%10.86%-27.56%-7.07%
FQEMX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM
90.54%55.98%6.67%12.18%-20.68%0.32%

Correlation

The correlation between IPOAX and FQEMX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2021

0.81

The correlation between IPOAX and FQEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IPOAX vs. FQEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPOAX
IPOAX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
IPOAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPOAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPOAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
IPOAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPOAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

FQEMX
FQEMX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
FQEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FQEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FQEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
FQEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FQEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPOAX vs. FQEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Delaware Ivy Systematic Emerging Markets Equity Fund (IPOAX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM (FQEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IPOAXFQEMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.84

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.60

8.54

-4.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.83

31.24

-18.41

IPOAX vs. FQEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPOAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is lower than the FQEMX Sharpe Ratio of 5.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPOAX and FQEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IPOAX vs. FQEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPOAX drawdown since its inception was -67.11%, which is greater than FQEMX's maximum drawdown of -34.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPOAX and FQEMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IPOAXFQEMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.11%

-34.46%

-32.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.39%

-18.93%

+5.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.86%

-18.93%

+2.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.64%

-10.73%

-12.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.75%

5.12%

-1.37%

Volatility

IPOAX vs. FQEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Delaware Ivy Systematic Emerging Markets Equity Fund (IPOAX) is 10.25%, while Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM (FQEMX) has a volatility of 18.86%. This indicates that IPOAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FQEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IPOAXFQEMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.25%

18.86%

-8.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.97%

29.35%

-11.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.32%

32.10%

-11.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.39%

22.29%

-1.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.45%

22.29%

-1.84%

IPOAX vs. FQEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPOAX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FQEMX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

IPOAX vs. FQEMX - Dividend Comparison

IPOAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.74%, more than FQEMX's 1.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FQEMX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM
1.67%3.18%3.15%4.82%3.93%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IPOAX
Delaware Ivy Systematic Emerging Markets Equity Fund
7.74%10.01%3.35%3.23%14.83%0.55%0.75%0.74%0.68%0.00%0.00%0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


IPOAX and FQEMX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FQEMX has higher volatility (18.86%) compared to IPOAX (10.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPOAX dropped -67.11% vs FQEMX's -34.46%.

FQEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.03 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IPOAX and FQEMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer