PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IPMIX vs. QCGDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IPMIX vs. QCGDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Index Plus MidCap Portfolio (IPMIX) and Quantified Common Ground Fund (QCGDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPMIX achieves a 15.43% return, which is significantly higher than QCGDX's 10.59% return.


IPMIX

1D
1.10%
1M
0.04%
6M
11.79%
YTD
15.43%
1Y
23.10%
3Y*
14.16%
5Y*
8.95%
10Y*
10.26%
ALL TIME*
9.91%

QCGDX

1D
2.98%
1M
-0.60%
6M
7.23%
YTD
10.59%
1Y
14.86%
3Y*
8.67%
5Y*
7.37%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

IPMIX vs. QCGDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IPMIX
Voya Index Plus MidCap Portfolio
15.43%8.27%15.17%17.49%-14.10%27.70%8.18%0.00%
QCGDX
Quantified Common Ground Fund
10.59%1.02%9.87%14.74%-12.23%32.19%14.65%0.10%

Correlation

The correlation between IPMIX and QCGDX is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2019

0.77

The correlation between IPMIX and QCGDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IPMIX vs. QCGDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IPMIX
IPMIX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
IPMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
IPMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

QCGDX
QCGDX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
QCGDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCGDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCGDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
QCGDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCGDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IPMIX vs. QCGDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Index Plus MidCap Portfolio (IPMIX) and Quantified Common Ground Fund (QCGDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IPMIXQCGDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.18

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

1.57

+0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.27

5.84

-0.57

IPMIX vs. QCGDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPMIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is comparable to the QCGDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPMIX and QCGDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IPMIX vs. QCGDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPMIX drawdown since its inception was -54.71%, which is greater than QCGDX's maximum drawdown of -22.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPMIX and QCGDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IPMIXQCGDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.71%

-22.37%

-32.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.67%

-9.38%

-3.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.97%

-16.10%

-7.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.28%

-20.18%

-4.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.50%

-6.69%

+0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.14%

-6.09%

-4.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.34%

2.51%

+1.83%

Volatility

IPMIX vs. QCGDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Voya Index Plus MidCap Portfolio (IPMIX) is 3.62%, while Quantified Common Ground Fund (QCGDX) has a volatility of 6.32%. This indicates that IPMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCGDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IPMIXQCGDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.62%

6.32%

-2.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.60%

13.27%

+4.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.63%

15.29%

+5.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.23%

15.17%

+6.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.03%

16.73%

+5.30%

IPMIX vs. QCGDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPMIX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than QCGDX's 1.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

IPMIX vs. QCGDX - Dividend Comparison

IPMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.54%, more than QCGDX's 0.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IPMIX
Voya Index Plus MidCap Portfolio
6.54%7.59%4.15%4.66%29.03%1.13%1.20%10.96%16.62%7.62%10.43%17.41%
QCGDX
Quantified Common Ground Fund
0.63%0.69%4.42%0.22%0.00%5.44%1.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IPMIX and QCGDX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QCGDX has higher volatility (6.32%) compared to IPMIX (3.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPMIX dropped -54.71% vs QCGDX's -22.37%.

IPMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IPMIX and QCGDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer