PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IPKW vs. SPMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IPKW vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (IPKW) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPKW achieves a 3.20% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 29.91% return. Over the past 10 years, IPKW has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 11.86%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 21.03% annualized return.


IPKW

1D
-1.58%
1M
-3.12%
YTD
3.20%
6M
3.35%
1Y
21.92%
3Y*
22.84%
5Y*
9.02%
10Y*
11.86%

SPMO

1D
-4.53%
1M
6.65%
YTD
29.91%
6M
28.13%
1Y
43.55%
3Y*
42.47%
5Y*
22.89%
10Y*
21.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPKW vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IPKW
Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF
3.20%45.50%10.56%15.12%-12.81%11.41%16.18%20.26%-21.59%34.21%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
29.91%26.58%45.82%17.56%-10.45%22.64%28.25%25.93%-0.92%27.76%

Correlation

The correlation between IPKW and SPMO is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015

0.53

The correlation between IPKW and SPMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (3 years) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IPKW vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IPKW
SPMO

Financial Services

35.1%
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

17.7%
1.1%

Energy

17.4%
2.8%

Industrials

11.8%
10.9%

Communication Services

5.4%
8.0%

Technology

3.8%
56.8%

Utilities

3.3%
2.6%

Basic Materials

3.0%
1.5%

Healthcare

1.0%
5.9%

Real Estate

1.0%
0.9%

Consumer Defensive

0.4%
3.8%

Financial Services

IPKW
35.1%
SPMO
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

IPKW
17.7%
SPMO
1.1%

Energy

IPKW
17.4%
SPMO
2.8%

Industrials

IPKW
11.8%
SPMO
10.9%

Communication Services

IPKW
5.4%
SPMO
8.0%

Technology

IPKW
3.8%
SPMO
56.8%

Utilities

IPKW
3.3%
SPMO
2.6%

Basic Materials

IPKW
3.0%
SPMO
1.5%

Healthcare

IPKW
1.0%
SPMO
5.9%

Real Estate

IPKW
1.0%
SPMO
0.9%

Consumer Defensive

IPKW
0.4%
SPMO
3.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IPKW vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPKW
IPKW Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
IPKW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPKW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPKW Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
IPKW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPKW Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPKW vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (IPKW) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IPKWSPMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.39

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

3.45

-1.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.94

12.97

-5.03

IPKW vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPKW Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the SPMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPKW and SPMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IPKW vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPKW drawdown since its inception was -47.24%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPKW and SPMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IPKWSPMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.24%

-30.95%

-16.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.14%

-12.70%

+3.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.77%

-20.13%

+2.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.56%

-22.74%

-9.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.24%

-30.95%

-16.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.09%

-4.53%

-0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.97%

-4.59%

-4.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.77%

3.37%

-0.60%

Volatility

IPKW vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (IPKW) is 4.36%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 11.75%. This indicates that IPKW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IPKWSPMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.36%

11.75%

-7.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.34%

17.78%

-5.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.69%

20.55%

-5.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.05%

19.88%

-2.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.79%

20.60%

-2.81%

IPKW vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPKW has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

IPKW vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

IPKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, more than SPMO's 0.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IPKW
Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF
3.63%3.55%4.12%2.66%3.77%7.37%1.45%2.41%2.61%0.93%2.82%1.31%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.68%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


IPKW and SPMO have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPMO has higher volatility (11.75%) compared to IPKW (4.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPKW dropped -47.24% vs SPMO's -30.95%.

On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 21.03% vs 11.86% for IPKW. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, IPKW has been the lower-risk option at 4.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 21.03% return vs 11.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for IPKW.

IPKW has the higher dividend yield at 3.63%, compared with 0.68% for SPMO.

IPKW is categorized as Global Equities, while SPMO is Momentum. IPKW tracks NASDAQ International BuyBack Achievers Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for IPKW and 0.13% for SPMO.

SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IPKW and SPMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer