PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IPKW vs. PKW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IPKW vs. PKW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (IPKW) and Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (PKW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPKW achieves a 6.08% return, which is significantly higher than PKW's 2.43% return. Over the past 10 years, IPKW has underperformed PKW with an annualized return of 11.44%, while PKW has yielded a comparatively higher 12.81% annualized return.


IPKW

1D
-1.07%
1M
0.86%
YTD
6.08%
6M
9.96%
1Y
26.14%
3Y*
23.62%
5Y*
9.19%
10Y*
11.44%

PKW

1D
-0.38%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
2.43%
6M
3.41%
1Y
16.01%
3Y*
18.60%
5Y*
9.90%
10Y*
12.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPKW vs. PKW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IPKW
Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF
6.08%45.50%10.56%15.12%-12.81%11.41%16.18%20.26%-21.59%34.21%
PKW
Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF
2.43%17.92%17.33%17.24%-10.21%32.62%8.41%34.09%-10.53%17.75%

Correlation

The correlation between IPKW and PKW is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2014

0.69

The correlation between IPKW and PKW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

IPKW vs. PKW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IPKW
PKW

Financial Services

32.3%
29.4%

Energy

21.4%
5.6%

Consumer Cyclical

15.8%
19.1%

Industrials

11.4%
14.2%

Communication Services

6.3%
4.0%

Technology

3.8%
10.8%

Utilities

3.5%
2.1%

Basic Materials

2.9%
1.1%

Real Estate

1.1%
0.3%

Healthcare

1.0%
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

0.4%
3.4%

Financial Services

IPKW
32.3%
PKW
29.4%

Energy

IPKW
21.4%
PKW
5.6%

Consumer Cyclical

IPKW
15.8%
PKW
19.1%

Industrials

IPKW
11.4%
PKW
14.2%

Communication Services

IPKW
6.3%
PKW
4.0%

Technology

IPKW
3.8%
PKW
10.8%

Utilities

IPKW
3.5%
PKW
2.1%

Basic Materials

IPKW
2.9%
PKW
1.1%

Real Estate

IPKW
1.1%
PKW
0.3%

Healthcare

IPKW
1.0%
PKW
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

IPKW
0.4%
PKW
3.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IPKW vs. PKW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPKW
IPKW Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
IPKW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPKW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPKW Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
IPKW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPKW Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

PKW
PKW Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
PKW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PKW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PKW Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
PKW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
PKW Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPKW vs. PKW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (IPKW) and Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (PKW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IPKWPKWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.84

1.23

+0.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.58

1.84

+0.74

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.22

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

2.05

+0.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.91

6.46

+3.45

IPKW vs. PKW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPKW Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is higher than the PKW Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPKW and PKW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IPKWPKWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

1.23

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.57

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.65

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.52

+0.08

Drawdowns

IPKW vs. PKW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPKW drawdown since its inception was -47.24%, smaller than the maximum PKW drawdown of -54.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPKW and PKW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IPKWPKWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.24%

-54.59%

+7.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.14%

-7.86%

-1.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.77%

-20.91%

+3.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.18%

-23.51%

-9.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.24%

-40.93%

-6.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.45%

-2.15%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.00%

-7.96%

-1.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

2.49%

+0.15%

Volatility

IPKW vs. PKW - Volatility Comparison

Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (IPKW) has a higher volatility of 4.37% compared to Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (PKW) at 3.18%. This indicates that IPKW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PKW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IPKWPKWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.37%

3.18%

+1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.86%

9.39%

+2.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.31%

13.14%

+1.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.01%

17.45%

-0.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.91%

19.78%

-1.87%

IPKW vs. PKW - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPKW has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than PKW's 0.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

IPKW vs. PKW - Dividend Comparison

IPKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, more than PKW's 0.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IPKW
Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF
3.52%3.55%4.12%2.66%3.77%7.37%1.45%2.41%2.61%0.93%2.82%1.31%
PKW
Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF
0.90%0.99%0.86%1.17%1.22%0.72%1.48%1.30%1.30%0.65%1.59%1.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


IPKW and PKW have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IPKW has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to PKW (3.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPKW dropped -47.24% vs PKW's -54.59%.

On 10-year performance, PKW leads with 12.81% vs 11.44% for IPKW. On fees, IPKW is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, PKW has been the lower-risk option at 3.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PKW has performed better with a 12.81% return vs 11.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IPKW is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PKW.

IPKW has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 0.90% for PKW.

IPKW is categorized as Global Equities, while PKW is Mid Cap Value Equities. IPKW tracks NASDAQ International BuyBack Achievers Index, while PKW tracks NASDAQ US BuyBack Achievers Index. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for IPKW and 0.62% for PKW.

IPKW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IPKW and PKW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer