PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IPKW vs. DRIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IPKW vs. DRIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (IPKW) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPKW achieves a 6.08% return, which is significantly lower than DRIV's 42.27% return.


IPKW

1D
-1.07%
1M
0.86%
YTD
6.08%
6M
9.96%
1Y
26.14%
3Y*
23.62%
5Y*
9.19%
10Y*
11.44%

DRIV

1D
-1.04%
1M
12.34%
YTD
42.27%
6M
41.87%
1Y
92.43%
3Y*
21.80%
5Y*
9.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPKW vs. DRIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IPKW
Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF
6.08%45.50%10.56%15.12%-12.81%11.41%16.18%20.26%-22.36%
DRIV
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF
42.27%30.42%-5.04%26.14%-34.13%27.80%62.76%28.54%-21.49%

Correlation

The correlation between IPKW and DRIV is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2018

0.75

The correlation between IPKW and DRIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IPKW vs. DRIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IPKW
DRIV

Financial Services

32.3%

-

Energy

21.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

15.8%
26.8%

Industrials

11.4%
19.4%

Communication Services

6.3%
5.4%

Technology

3.8%
34.0%

Utilities

3.5%

-

Basic Materials

2.9%
14.4%

Real Estate

1.1%

-

Healthcare

1.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.4%

-

Financial Services

IPKW
32.3%
DRIV

-

Energy

IPKW
21.4%
DRIV

-

Consumer Cyclical

IPKW
15.8%
DRIV
26.8%

Industrials

IPKW
11.4%
DRIV
19.4%

Communication Services

IPKW
6.3%
DRIV
5.4%

Technology

IPKW
3.8%
DRIV
34.0%

Utilities

IPKW
3.5%
DRIV

-

Basic Materials

IPKW
2.9%
DRIV
14.4%

Real Estate

IPKW
1.1%
DRIV

-

Healthcare

IPKW
1.0%
DRIV

-

Consumer Defensive

IPKW
0.4%
DRIV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IPKW vs. DRIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPKW
IPKW Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
IPKW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPKW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPKW Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
IPKW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPKW Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

DRIV
DRIV Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
DRIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRIV Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DRIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRIV Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPKW vs. DRIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (IPKW) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IPKWDRIVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.84

3.70

-1.86

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.58

4.35

-1.77

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.55

-0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

6.92

-4.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.91

24.10

-14.19

IPKW vs. DRIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPKW Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is lower than the DRIV Sharpe Ratio of 3.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPKW and DRIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IPKWDRIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

3.70

-1.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.35

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.54

+0.06

Drawdowns

IPKW vs. DRIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPKW drawdown since its inception was -47.24%, which is greater than DRIV's maximum drawdown of -41.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPKW and DRIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IPKWDRIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.24%

-41.93%

-5.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.14%

-13.43%

+4.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.77%

-34.18%

+16.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.18%

-41.93%

+8.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.45%

-1.04%

-1.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.00%

-15.13%

+6.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

3.85%

-1.21%

Volatility

IPKW vs. DRIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (IPKW) is 4.37%, while Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) has a volatility of 9.36%. This indicates that IPKW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IPKWDRIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.37%

9.36%

-4.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.86%

19.29%

-7.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.31%

25.14%

-10.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.01%

27.07%

-10.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.91%

27.40%

-9.49%

IPKW vs. DRIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPKW has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than DRIV's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

IPKW vs. DRIV - Dividend Comparison

IPKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, more than DRIV's 0.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DRIV
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF
0.75%1.07%2.07%1.62%1.24%0.32%0.29%1.23%2.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IPKW
Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF
3.52%3.55%4.12%2.66%3.77%7.37%1.45%2.41%2.61%0.93%2.82%1.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


IPKW and DRIV have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRIV has higher volatility (9.36%) compared to IPKW (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPKW dropped -47.24% vs DRIV's -41.93%.

On 5-year performance, DRIV leads with 9.49% vs 9.19% for IPKW. On fees, IPKW is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, IPKW has been the lower-risk option at 4.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DRIV has performed better with a 9.49% return vs 9.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IPKW is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for DRIV.

IPKW has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 0.75% for DRIV.

IPKW tracks NASDAQ International BuyBack Achievers Index, while DRIV tracks Solactive Autonomous & Electric Vehicles Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for IPKW and 0.68% for DRIV.

DRIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.70 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IPKW and DRIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer