IPIRX vs. BBALX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IPIRX (Voya Global Perspectives Portfolio) and BBALX (Northern Global Tactical Asset Allocation Fund) are both Global Allocation funds. Over the past 10 years, IPIRX returned 6.45%/yr vs 7.12%/yr for BBALX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IPIRX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for BBALX.

Performance

IPIRX vs. BBALX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Global Perspectives Portfolio (IPIRX) and Northern Global Tactical Asset Allocation Fund (BBALX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPIRX achieves a 6.84% return, which is significantly lower than BBALX's 8.20% return. Over the past 10 years, IPIRX has underperformed BBALX with an annualized return of 6.45%, while BBALX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.12% annualized return.

IPIRX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 2.01%
• YTD: 6.84%
• 6M: 7.17%
• 1Y: 16.10%
• 3Y*: 11.74%
• 5Y*: 4.43%
• 10Y*: 6.45%

BBALX

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 3.32%
• YTD: 8.20%
• 6M: 8.73%
• 1Y: 19.11%
• 3Y*: 12.74%
• 5Y*: 6.02%
• 10Y*: 7.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPIRX vs. BBALX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IPIRX Voya Global Perspectives Portfolio	6.84%	14.21%	7.31%	10.65%	-17.52%	6.06%	16.10%	18.35%	-9.87%	15.00%
BBALX Northern Global Tactical Asset Allocation Fund	8.20%	14.74%	8.00%	10.74%	-12.79%	11.17%	6.45%	17.62%	-7.89%	14.18%

Correlation

The correlation between IPIRX and BBALX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014	0.91

Over the past year, the correlation between IPIRX and BBALX has dropped to 0.68 - well below their long-term average of 0.91, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

IPIRX vs. BBALX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPIRX

IPIRX Risk / Return Rank: 54
IPIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
IPIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
IPIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
IPIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
IPIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 56

BBALX

BBALX Risk / Return Rank: 65
BBALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
BBALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
BBALX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
BBALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
BBALX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPIRX vs. BBALX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Global Perspectives Portfolio (IPIRX) and Northern Global Tactical Asset Allocation Fund (BBALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IPIRX	BBALX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.18	2.36	-0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.27	3.34	-0.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.45	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.48	3.08	-0.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.31	13.38	-2.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IPIRX vs. BBALX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPIRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the BBALX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPIRX and BBALX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IPIRX	BBALX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.18	2.36	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42	0.61	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67	0.67	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	0.54	+0.07

Drawdowns

IPIRX vs. BBALX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPIRX drawdown since its inception was -24.97%, smaller than the maximum BBALX drawdown of -33.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPIRX and BBALX.

Drawdown Indicators

	IPIRX	BBALX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.97%	-33.24%	+8.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.88%	-6.42%	-1.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.54%	-9.72%	-0.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.97%	-18.75%	-6.22%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.97%	-26.33%	+1.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.19%	0.00%	-0.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.85%	-5.49%	+0.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.67%	1.46%	+0.21%

Volatility

IPIRX vs. BBALX - Volatility Comparison

Voya Global Perspectives Portfolio (IPIRX) and Northern Global Tactical Asset Allocation Fund (BBALX) have volatilities of 2.53% and 2.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IPIRX	BBALX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.53%	2.47%	+0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.32%	6.81%	+0.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.11%	8.41%	+0.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.82%	9.91%	+0.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.78%	10.68%	-0.90%

IPIRX vs. BBALX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPIRX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BBALX's 0.26% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IPIRX vs. BBALX - Dividend Comparison

IPIRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.20%, more than BBALX's 2.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BBALX Northern Global Tactical Asset Allocation Fund	2.69%	3.11%	3.28%	3.72%	7.22%	4.57%	6.63%	2.15%	4.23%	3.26%	3.01%	4.20%
IPIRX Voya Global Perspectives Portfolio	44.20%	5.64%	3.25%	14.65%	13.55%	6.34%	6.25%	7.80%	1.30%	2.78%	2.78%	7.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IPIRX and BBALX in my portfolio?

IPIRX and BBALX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IPIRX or BBALX?

IPIRX has higher volatility (2.53%) compared to BBALX (2.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPIRX dropped -24.97% vs BBALX's -33.24%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BBALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.