IPIIX vs. IMCDX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

IPIIX (Voya Intermediate Bond Portfolio) and IMCDX (Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund) are both mutual funds - IPIIX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by Voya, while IMCDX is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund managed by Voya. Their 0.43 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. IPIIX charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IMCDX.

Performance

IPIIX vs. IMCDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Intermediate Bond Portfolio (IPIIX) and Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund (IMCDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

IPIIX

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: -1.37%
• 6M: -0.62%
• YTD: -0.22%
• 1Y: 2.26%
• 3Y*: 4.09%
• 5Y*: -0.46%
• 10Y*: 1.68%
• ALL TIME*: 1.73%

IMCDX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
IPIIX Voya Intermediate Bond Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

IPIIX vs. IMCDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IPIIX Voya Intermediate Bond Portfolio	-0.22%	6.87%	2.44%	6.47%	-15.06%	-1.42%	7.84%	9.87%	-0.52%	5.05%
IMCDX Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund	0.00%	0.00%	6.44%	8.51%	-13.79%	0.08%	8.35%	13.65%	-1.77%	9.40%

Correlation

The correlation between IPIIX and IMCDX is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.49
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2012	0.43

The correlation between IPIIX and IMCDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.42 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

IPIIX vs. IMCDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IPIIX

IPIIX Risk / Return Rank: 16
IPIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
IPIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
IPIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
IPIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
IPIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 17

IMCDX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IPIIX vs. IMCDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Intermediate Bond Portfolio (IPIIX) and Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund (IMCDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IPIIX	IMCDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.65	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.97	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.99	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.55	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	IPIIX	IMCDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.19%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.04%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.54%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.16%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-20.28%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.70%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.97%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.14%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IPIIX	IMCDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.16%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.75%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.62%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.93%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.01%	—	—

IPIIX vs. IMCDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPIIX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than IMCDX's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

IPIIX vs. IMCDX - Dividend Comparison

IPIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, while IMCDX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IMCDX Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund	0.00%	0.00%	4.08%	4.21%	3.80%	6.14%	4.64%	4.99%	5.30%	4.79%	5.22%	5.11%
IPIIX Voya Intermediate Bond Portfolio	3.60%	3.85%	4.29%	3.32%	2.54%	2.48%	5.67%	3.46%	3.71%	3.35%	3.20%	3.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IPIIX and IMCDX in my portfolio?

IPIIX and IMCDX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.