IPFCX vs. SICIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Poplar Forest Cornerstone Fund (IPFCX) and SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX).
IPFCX is managed by Poplar Forest Capital. It was launched on Dec 30, 2014. SICIX is managed by SEI. It was launched on Nov 16, 2003.
Performance
IPFCX vs. SICIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IPFCX vs. SICIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPFCX Poplar Forest Cornerstone Fund | -0.13% | 16.22% | 6.67% | 6.64% | -1.31% | 30.14% | 4.29% | 20.56% | -10.49% | 6.01% |
SICIX SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund | 0.36% | 8.12% | 5.52% | 5.29% | -6.23% | 4.13% | 2.62% | 9.36% | -2.07% | 5.13% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IPFCX achieves a -0.13% return, which is significantly lower than SICIX's 0.36% return. Over the past 10 years, IPFCX has outperformed SICIX with an annualized return of 8.76%, while SICIX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.36% annualized return.
IPFCX
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -4.01%
- YTD
- -0.13%
- 6M
- 3.03%
- 1Y
- 11.45%
- 3Y*
- 9.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.75%
- 10Y*
- 8.76%
SICIX
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -2.39%
- YTD
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- 1Y
- 5.89%
- 3Y*
- 5.80%
- 5Y*
- 3.22%
- 10Y*
- 3.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IPFCX vs. SICIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IPFCX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than SICIX's 0.51% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IPFCX vs. SICIX — Risk / Return Rank
IPFCX
SICIX
IPFCX vs. SICIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Poplar Forest Cornerstone Fund (IPFCX) and SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IPFCX | SICIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.14 | 1.66 | -0.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.61 | 2.20 | -0.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.34 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | 2.19 | -0.86 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.18 | 8.95 | -3.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IPFCX | SICIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | 1.66 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.84 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.87 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.78 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between IPFCX and SICIX is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
IPFCX vs. SICIX - Dividend Comparison
IPFCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.42%, more than SICIX's 2.86% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPFCX Poplar Forest Cornerstone Fund | 9.42% | 9.41% | 7.31% | 4.20% | 8.55% | 12.98% | 1.94% | 7.73% | 5.24% | 2.35% | 3.78% | 4.78% |
SICIX SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund | 2.86% | 2.87% | 3.67% | 2.80% | 4.69% | 3.46% | 1.84% | 2.91% | 1.80% | 1.81% | 1.64% | 1.97% |
Drawdowns
IPFCX vs. SICIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IPFCX drawdown since its inception was -32.10%, which is greater than SICIX's maximum drawdown of -27.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPFCX and SICIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IPFCX | SICIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.10% | -27.62% | -4.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.49% | -2.73% | -5.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.33% | -10.94% | -3.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.10% | -11.61% | -20.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.00% | -2.39% | -2.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.12% | -3.59% | -0.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.19% | 0.67% | +1.52% |
Volatility
IPFCX vs. SICIX - Volatility Comparison
Poplar Forest Cornerstone Fund (IPFCX) has a higher volatility of 2.53% compared to SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX) at 1.24%. This indicates that IPFCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SICIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IPFCX | SICIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.53% | 1.24% | +1.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.90% | 2.06% | +3.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.47% | 3.66% | +6.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.29% | 3.87% | +7.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.59% | 3.89% | +9.70% |