IPDP vs. LQTI
IPDP (Dividend Performers ETF) and LQTI (FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. IPDP charges 1.52%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LQTI.
Performance
IPDP vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IPDP
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LQTI
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 0.16%
- 6M
- -0.04%
- 1Y
- 5.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IPDP vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF | 0.00% |
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | -0.31% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IPDP vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank
IPDP
LQTI
IPDP vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IPDP | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.88 | — |
Drawdowns
IPDP vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IPDP drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum LQTI drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPDP and LQTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IPDP | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -3.41% | +3.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.44% | +1.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -0.88% | +0.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.11% | — |
Volatility
IPDP vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IPDP | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.65% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.02% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 5.10% | -5.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 5.97% | -5.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 5.97% | -5.97% |
IPDP vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
IPDP has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
IPDP vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison
IPDP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LQTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.11%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | 9.11% | 7.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, LQTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LQTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for IPDP.
LQTI has the higher dividend yield at 9.11%, compared with 0.00% for IPDP.
They also come from different issuers: Innovative Portfolios and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 1.52% for IPDP and 0.65% for LQTI.
Find the right allocation for IPDP and LQTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer