IPDP vs. CWII

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

IPDP (Dividend Performers ETF) and CWII (REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. IPDP charges 1.52%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for CWII.

Performance

IPDP vs. CWII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP) and REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF (CWII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

IPDP

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CWII

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 10,273.16%
• YTD: 13,199.78%
• 6M: 11,946.90%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPDP vs. CWII - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF	0.00%
CWII REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF	13,116.84%

Return for Risk

IPDP vs. CWII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP) and REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF (CWII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

IPDP vs. CWII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPDP drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum CWII drawdown of -51.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPDP and CWII.

Drawdown Indicators

	IPDP	CWII	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-51.04%	+51.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-33.26%	+33.26%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IPDP	CWII	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	13,701.30%	-13,701.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	13,701.30%	-13,701.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	13,701.30%	-13,701.30%

IPDP vs. CWII - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPDP has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than CWII's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

IPDP vs. CWII - Dividend Comparison

IPDP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CWII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 123.26%.

Position	TTM	2025
CWII REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF	123.26%	6.09%
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, IPDP or CWII?

On fees, CWII is cheaper at 1.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IPDP or CWII?

CWII is cheaper with a 1.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for IPDP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IPDP or CWII?

CWII has the higher dividend yield at 123.26%, compared with 0.00% for IPDP.

What is the main difference between IPDP and CWII?

They also come from different issuers: Innovative Portfolios and REX Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.52% for IPDP and 1.03% for CWII.