PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IPBAX vs. TLDTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IPBAX vs. TLDTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Real Return Fund (IPBAX) and T. Rowe Price U.S. Limited Duration TIPS Index Fund (TLDTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPBAX achieves a 8.62% return, which is significantly higher than TLDTX's 1.26% return.


IPBAX

1D
0.74%
1M
-2.07%
6M
2.02%
YTD
8.62%
1Y
15.74%
3Y*
9.84%
5Y*
4.57%
10Y*
4.29%
ALL TIME*
4.10%

TLDTX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.11%
6M
0.69%
YTD
1.26%
1Y
2.39%
3Y*
3.68%
5Y*
1.52%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

IPBAX vs. TLDTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IPBAX
Allspring Real Return Fund
8.62%10.37%8.12%5.35%-10.75%7.74%1.57%
TLDTX
T. Rowe Price U.S. Limited Duration TIPS Index Fund
1.26%6.32%1.16%3.23%-4.84%5.08%1.50%

Correlation

The correlation between IPBAX and TLDTX is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2020

0.56

Over the past year, the correlation between IPBAX and TLDTX has dropped to 0.25 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IPBAX vs. TLDTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IPBAX
IPBAX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
IPBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
IPBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

TLDTX
TLDTX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
TLDTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLDTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLDTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
TLDTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLDTX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IPBAX vs. TLDTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Real Return Fund (IPBAX) and T. Rowe Price U.S. Limited Duration TIPS Index Fund (TLDTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IPBAXTLDTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.22

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

0.83

+1.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.07

1.49

+6.57

IPBAX vs. TLDTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPBAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is higher than the TLDTX Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPBAX and TLDTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IPBAX vs. TLDTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPBAX drawdown since its inception was -15.13%, which is greater than TLDTX's maximum drawdown of -7.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPBAX and TLDTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IPBAXTLDTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.13%

-7.24%

-7.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.49%

-3.28%

-3.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.49%

-4.50%

-1.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.94%

-7.24%

-6.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.80%

-1.71%

-4.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.14%

-2.26%

-0.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

1.82%

+0.01%

Volatility

IPBAX vs. TLDTX - Volatility Comparison

Allspring Real Return Fund (IPBAX) has a higher volatility of 3.05% compared to T. Rowe Price U.S. Limited Duration TIPS Index Fund (TLDTX) at 0.48%. This indicates that IPBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLDTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IPBAXTLDTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.05%

0.48%

+2.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.33%

1.55%

+5.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.97%

4.78%

+4.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.51%

4.65%

+2.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.16%

4.43%

+1.73%

IPBAX vs. TLDTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPBAX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than TLDTX's 0.21% expense ratio.


Dividends

IPBAX vs. TLDTX - Dividend Comparison

IPBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.01%, more than TLDTX's 4.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IPBAX
Allspring Real Return Fund
12.01%2.58%2.26%3.71%5.07%3.84%1.26%2.12%2.57%1.96%1.77%2.13%
TLDTX
T. Rowe Price U.S. Limited Duration TIPS Index Fund
4.22%4.66%1.63%4.09%6.45%4.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IPBAX and TLDTX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IPBAX has higher volatility (3.05%) compared to TLDTX (0.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPBAX dropped -15.13% vs TLDTX's -7.24%.

IPBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IPBAX and TLDTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer