IOYY vs. GSG
IOYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST IONQ ETF) and GSG (iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - IOYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while GSG is a Commodities fund tracking the S&P GSCI Total Return Index. IOYY is actively managed, while GSG is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. IOYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GSG.
Performance
IOYY vs. GSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IOYY achieves a -11.92% return, which is significantly lower than GSG's 40.46% return.
IOYY
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- 6.59%
- YTD
- -11.92%
- 6M
- -23.78%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSG
- 1D
- -1.49%
- 1M
- -5.32%
- YTD
- 40.46%
- 6M
- 38.18%
- 1Y
- 49.68%
- 3Y*
- 18.78%
- 5Y*
- 15.39%
- 10Y*
- 7.42%
IOYY vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IOYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST IONQ ETF | -11.92% | -11.64% |
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust | 40.46% | -0.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between IOYY and GSG is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | -0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IOYY vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank
IOYY
GSG
IOYY vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST IONQ ETF (IOYY) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IOYY | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.03 | -0.09 | -0.94 |
Drawdowns
IOYY vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IOYY drawdown since its inception was -38.47%, smaller than the maximum GSG drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IOYY and GSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IOYY | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.47% | -89.62% | +51.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.57% | -57.59% | +29.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.12% | -63.71% | +40.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.62% | — |
Volatility
IOYY vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IOYY | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.72% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 20.48% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.32% | 23.01% | +11.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.32% | 22.61% | +11.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.32% | 22.03% | +12.29% |
IOYY vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison
IOYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than GSG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
IOYY vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison
IOYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 122.28%, while GSG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IOYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST IONQ ETF | 122.28% | 28.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IOYY and GSG have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GSG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GSG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for IOYY.
IOYY has the higher dividend yield at 122.28%, compared with 0.00% for GSG.
IOYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while GSG is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for IOYY and 0.75% for GSG.
Find the right allocation for IOYY and GSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer