IOYY vs. COMT
IOYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST IONQ ETF) and COMT (iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IOYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while COMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. IOYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for COMT.
Performance
IOYY vs. COMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IOYY achieves a -11.92% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 37.50% return.
IOYY
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- 6.59%
- YTD
- -11.92%
- 6M
- -23.78%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COMT
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- -5.00%
- YTD
- 37.50%
- 6M
- 36.36%
- 1Y
- 45.51%
- 3Y*
- 16.18%
- 5Y*
- 13.14%
- 10Y*
- 8.79%
IOYY vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IOYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST IONQ ETF | -11.92% | -11.64% |
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF | 37.50% | -0.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between IOYY and COMT is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IOYY vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank
IOYY
COMT
IOYY vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST IONQ ETF (IOYY) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IOYY | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.14 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.03 | 0.20 | -1.23 |
Drawdowns
IOYY vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IOYY drawdown since its inception was -38.47%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IOYY and COMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IOYY | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.47% | -51.89% | +13.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.57% | -6.30% | -22.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.12% | -24.06% | +0.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.40% | — |
Volatility
IOYY vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IOYY | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.46% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.88% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.32% | 21.36% | +12.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.32% | 21.07% | +13.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.32% | 18.89% | +15.43% |
IOYY vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IOYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
IOYY vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison
IOYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 122.28%, more than COMT's 5.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF | 5.63% | 7.74% | 4.90% | 5.19% | 29.79% | 17.79% | 0.36% | 2.61% | 11.65% | 5.16% | 0.52% | 1.44% |
IOYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST IONQ ETF | 122.28% | 28.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IOYY and COMT have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COMT is cheaper at 0.48% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COMT is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for IOYY.
IOYY has the higher dividend yield at 122.28%, compared with 5.63% for COMT.
IOYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while COMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for IOYY and 0.48% for COMT.
Find the right allocation for IOYY and COMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer