IOO vs. PJBF
IOO (iShares Global 100 ETF) and PJBF (PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF) are both Global Equities funds. IOO is passively managed, while PJBF is actively managed. IOO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for PJBF.
Performance
IOO vs. PJBF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IOO
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 9.29%
- YTD
- 10.67%
- 1Y
- 27.86%
- 3Y*
- 23.22%
- 5Y*
- 15.70%
- 10Y*
- 16.21%
PJBF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IOO vs. PJBF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IOO iShares Global 100 ETF | 0.94% |
PJBF PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF | 0.00% |
IOO vs. PJBF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IOO
PJBF
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
IOO
PJBF
Communication Services
IOO
PJBF
Financial Services
IOO
PJBF
Healthcare
IOO
PJBF
Consumer Cyclical
IOO
PJBF
Consumer Defensive
IOO
PJBF
Industrials
IOO
PJBF
Energy
IOO
PJBF
-
Basic Materials
IOO
PJBF
-
Utilities
IOO
PJBF
Real Estate
IOO
PJBF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IOO vs. PJBF — Risk / Return Rank
IOO
PJBF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IOO vs. PJBF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) and PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF (PJBF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IOO | PJBF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.82 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.92 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IOO vs. PJBF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IOO drawdown since its inception was -55.85%, which is greater than PJBF's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IOO and PJBF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IOO | PJBF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.85% | 0.00% | -55.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.52% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.73% | 0.00% | -2.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.23% | 0.00% | -11.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.56% | — | — |
Volatility
IOO vs. PJBF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IOO | PJBF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.03% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.72% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.35% | 0.00% | +14.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.19% | 0.00% | +17.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.70% | 0.00% | +17.70% |
IOO vs. PJBF - Expense Ratio Comparison
IOO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than PJBF's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
IOO vs. PJBF - Dividend Comparison
IOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, while PJBF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IOO iShares Global 100 ETF | 0.84% | 0.92% | 1.08% | 1.49% | 2.00% | 1.53% | 1.49% | 2.02% | 2.54% | 2.23% | 2.75% | 2.89% |
PJBF PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, IOO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IOO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for PJBF.
IOO has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.00% for PJBF.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IOO and 0.59% for PJBF.
Find the right allocation for IOO and PJBF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer