IOO vs. KLMT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IOO (iShares Global 100 ETF) and KLMT (Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF) are both Global Equities funds - IOO tracks the S&P Global 100 Index (Net) while KLMT tracks the MSCI ACWI Select Climate 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IOO returned 38.24% vs 27.86% for KLMT. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IOO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for KLMT.

Performance

IOO vs. KLMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) and Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF (KLMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IOO having a 12.26% return and KLMT slightly lower at 12.04%.

IOO

• 1D: -1.33%
• 1M: 5.37%
• YTD: 12.26%
• 6M: 12.43%
• 1Y: 38.24%
• 3Y*: 25.48%
• 5Y*: 16.68%
• 10Y*: 16.70%

KLMT

• 1D: -0.78%
• 1M: 5.23%
• YTD: 12.04%
• 6M: 12.88%
• 1Y: 27.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IOO vs. KLMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IOO iShares Global 100 ETF	12.26%	27.02%	4.08%
KLMT Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF	12.04%	21.31%	4.94%

Correlation

The correlation between IOO and KLMT is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2024	0.93

The correlation between IOO and KLMT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

IOO vs. KLMT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IOO	KLMT
Technology	46.2%	30.0%
Communication Services	11.0%	9.6%
Financial Services	9.1%	16.9%
Consumer Cyclical	8.4%	9.2%
Healthcare	8.4%	8.0%
Consumer Defensive	5.6%	4.6%
Industrials	4.8%	10.2%
Energy	3.6%	4.1%
Basic Materials	1.7%	2.8%
Utilities	0.5%	2.0%
Real Estate	0.2%	2.7%

Return for Risk

IOO vs. KLMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IOO

IOO Risk / Return Rank: 82
IOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
IOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
IOO Omega Ratio Rank: 82
IOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
IOO Martin Ratio Rank: 85

KLMT

KLMT Risk / Return Rank: 67
KLMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
KLMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
KLMT Omega Ratio Rank: 67
KLMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
KLMT Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IOO vs. KLMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) and Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF (KLMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IOO	KLMT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.84	2.22	+0.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.85	3.10	+0.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.40	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.87	2.93	+0.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.94	12.75	+5.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IOO vs. KLMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IOO Sharpe Ratio is 2.84, which is comparable to the KLMT Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IOO and KLMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IOO	KLMT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.84	2.22	+0.62
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	1.28	-0.89

Drawdowns

IOO vs. KLMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IOO drawdown since its inception was -55.85%, which is greater than KLMT's maximum drawdown of -16.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IOO and KLMT.

Drawdown Indicators

	IOO	KLMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.85%	-16.87%	-38.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.94%	-9.54%	-0.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.19%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.52%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.43%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.33%	-0.78%	-0.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.27%	-1.91%	-9.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.14%	2.19%	-0.05%

Volatility

IOO vs. KLMT - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) and Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF (KLMT) have volatilities of 3.81% and 3.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IOO	KLMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.81%	3.76%	+0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.59%	10.07%	+0.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.54%	12.61%	+0.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.04%	15.85%	+1.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.78%	15.85%	+1.93%

IOO vs. KLMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IOO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than KLMT's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

IOO vs. KLMT - Dividend Comparison

IOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than KLMT's 1.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IOO iShares Global 100 ETF	0.82%	0.92%	1.08%	1.49%	2.00%	1.53%	1.49%	2.02%	2.54%	2.23%	2.75%	2.89%
KLMT Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF	1.75%	1.95%	0.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IOO and KLMT in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, IOO and KLMT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, IOO or KLMT?

IOO has higher volatility (3.81%) compared to KLMT (3.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IOO dropped -55.85% vs KLMT's -16.87%.

Which ETF is better, IOO or KLMT?

On 1-year performance, IOO leads with 38.24% vs 27.86% for KLMT. On fees, KLMT is cheaper at 0.10% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IOO or KLMT?

Over the 1-year period, IOO has performed better with a 38.24% return vs 27.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IOO or KLMT?

KLMT is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IOO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IOO or KLMT?

KLMT has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.82% for IOO.

What is the main difference between IOO and KLMT?

IOO tracks S&P Global 100 Index (Net), while KLMT tracks MSCI ACWI Select Climate 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IOO and 0.10% for KLMT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.