PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IOO vs. FSUTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IOO vs. FSUTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) and Fidelity Select Utilities Portfolio (FSUTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IOO achieves a 9.16% return, which is significantly higher than FSUTX's 3.35% return. Over the past 10 years, IOO has outperformed FSUTX with an annualized return of 16.66%, while FSUTX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.35% annualized return.


IOO

1D
0.11%
1M
-1.76%
YTD
9.16%
6M
10.36%
1Y
33.70%
3Y*
23.85%
5Y*
15.85%
10Y*
16.66%

FSUTX

1D
0.51%
1M
-3.70%
YTD
3.35%
6M
3.29%
1Y
13.21%
3Y*
16.47%
5Y*
12.32%
10Y*
11.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IOO vs. FSUTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IOO
iShares Global 100 ETF
9.16%27.02%26.54%27.71%-16.34%26.03%18.61%30.01%-6.22%23.56%
FSUTX
Fidelity Select Utilities Portfolio
3.35%16.19%28.76%-1.12%5.20%17.64%0.75%22.68%8.41%17.94%

Correlation

The correlation between IOO and FSUTX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2000

0.57

Over the past year, the correlation between IOO and FSUTX has dropped to 0.29 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IOO vs. FSUTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IOO
IOO Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
IOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
IOO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
IOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
IOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

FSUTX
FSUTX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
FSUTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSUTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSUTX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
FSUTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSUTX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IOO vs. FSUTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) and Fidelity Select Utilities Portfolio (FSUTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IOOFSUTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.15

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.23

1.52

+1.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.35

3.41

+10.94

IOO vs. FSUTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IOO Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is higher than the FSUTX Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IOO and FSUTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IOO vs. FSUTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IOO drawdown since its inception was -55.85%, smaller than the maximum FSUTX drawdown of -66.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IOO and FSUTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IOOFSUTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.85%

-66.73%

+10.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.94%

-9.21%

-0.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.19%

-15.20%

-3.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.52%

-20.15%

-3.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.43%

-37.61%

+6.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.05%

-7.63%

+3.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.26%

-11.25%

-0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

4.11%

-1.87%

Volatility

IOO vs. FSUTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) is 4.82%, while Fidelity Select Utilities Portfolio (FSUTX) has a volatility of 5.96%. This indicates that IOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSUTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IOOFSUTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.82%

5.96%

-1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.31%

13.09%

-1.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.07%

16.35%

-2.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.12%

17.42%

-0.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.80%

19.40%

-1.60%

IOO vs. FSUTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IOO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than FSUTX's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

IOO vs. FSUTX - Dividend Comparison

IOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than FSUTX's 5.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSUTX
Fidelity Select Utilities Portfolio
5.08%6.61%6.50%3.52%4.67%2.68%4.86%2.29%8.37%5.61%2.51%4.47%
IOO
iShares Global 100 ETF
0.84%0.92%1.08%1.49%2.00%1.53%1.49%2.02%2.54%2.23%2.75%2.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


IOO and FSUTX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSUTX has higher volatility (5.96%) compared to IOO (4.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IOO dropped -55.85% vs FSUTX's -66.73%.

IOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IOO and FSUTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer