PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IOO vs. FIXT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IOO vs. FIXT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IOO (iShares Global 100 ETF) and FIXT (Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF) are both Global Equities funds - IOO tracks the S&P Global 100 Index (Net) while FIXT tracks the VettaFi Natural Disaster Response and Mitigation Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IOO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FIXT.

Performance

IOO vs. FIXT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) and Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IOO achieves a 12.26% return, which is significantly higher than FIXT's 0.23% return.

IOO

1D
-1.33%
1M
5.37%
YTD
12.26%
6M
12.43%
1Y
38.24%
3Y*
25.48%
5Y*
16.68%
10Y*
16.70%

FIXT

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.27%
YTD
0.23%
6M
0.07%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IOO vs. FIXT - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
IOO
iShares Global 100 ETF		12.26%21.46%
FIXT
Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF		0.23%4.58%

Correlation

The correlation between IOO and FIXT is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2025

0.27

IOO vs. FIXT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IOO
FIXT

Technology

46.2%

-

Communication Services

11.0%

-

Financial Services

9.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%

-

Healthcare

8.4%
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

5.6%

-

Industrials

4.8%

-

Energy

3.6%

-

Basic Materials

1.7%

-

Utilities

0.5%

-

Real Estate

0.2%

-

Technology

IOO
46.2%
FIXT

-

Communication Services

IOO
11.0%
FIXT

-

Financial Services

IOO
9.1%
FIXT

-

Consumer Cyclical

IOO
8.4%
FIXT

-

Healthcare

IOO
8.4%
FIXT
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

IOO
5.6%
FIXT

-

Industrials

IOO
4.8%
FIXT

-

Energy

IOO
3.6%
FIXT

-

Basic Materials

IOO
1.7%
FIXT

-

Utilities

IOO
0.5%
FIXT

-

Real Estate

IOO
0.2%
FIXT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Global 100 ETF

Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF

Often compared with IOO:
IOO vs. IVVIOO vs. SPYIOO vs. NDQ.AXIOO vs. OEFIOO vs. NDAQIOO vs. VGTIOO vs. MOAT
Often compared with FIXT:
FIXT vs. AIRRFIXT vs. WBIFFIXT vs. VTFIXT vs. KLMTFIXT vs. WBIGFIXT vs. AVGVFIXT vs. FLXR

Return for Risk

IOO vs. FIXT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IOO
IOO Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
IOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
IOO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
IOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
IOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
FIXT
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IOO vs. FIXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) and Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

IOOFIXTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.84

—

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.85

—

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

—

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.87

—

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.94

—

—

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IOO vs. FIXT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

IOOFIXTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.84

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

1.34

-0.94

Drawdowns

IOO vs. FIXT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IOO drawdown since its inception was -55.85%, which is greater than FIXT's maximum drawdown of -3.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IOO and FIXT.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IOOFIXTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.85%

-3.02%

-52.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.94%

—

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.19%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.52%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.43%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.33%

-1.88%

+0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.27%

-0.71%

-10.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

—

—

Volatility

IOO vs. FIXT - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IOOFIXTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.81%

—

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.59%

—

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.54%

3.77%

+9.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.04%

3.77%

+13.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.78%

3.77%

+14.01%

IOO vs. FIXT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IOO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than FIXT's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

IOO vs. FIXT - Dividend Comparison

IOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than FIXT's 5.55% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIXT
Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF		5.55%3.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IOO
iShares Global 100 ETF		0.82%0.92%1.08%1.49%2.00%1.53%1.49%2.02%2.54%2.23%2.75%2.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

IOO and FIXT have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IOO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IOO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FIXT.

FIXT has the higher dividend yield at 5.55%, compared with 0.82% for IOO.

IOO tracks S&P Global 100 Index (Net), while FIXT tracks VettaFi Natural Disaster Response and Mitigation Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Procure. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IOO and 0.75% for FIXT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IOO and FIXT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer