IOO vs. FCNTX

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

IOO (iShares Global 100 ETF) and FCNTX (Fidelity Contrafund) are both funds - IOO is a Global Equities fund tracking the S&P Global 100 Index (Net), while FCNTX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, IOO returned 16.66%/yr vs 17.48%/yr for FCNTX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IOO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for FCNTX.

Performance

IOO vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IOO achieves a 9.16% return, which is significantly higher than FCNTX's 6.65% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IOO having a 16.66% annualized return and FCNTX not far ahead at 17.48%.

IOO

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: -2.09%
• YTD: 9.16%
• 6M: 10.36%
• 1Y: 31.99%
• 3Y*: 23.85%
• 5Y*: 15.85%
• 10Y*: 16.66%

FCNTX

• 1D: 1.81%
• 1M: -0.15%
• YTD: 6.65%
• 6M: 7.93%
• 1Y: 20.59%
• 3Y*: 26.12%
• 5Y*: 14.41%
• 10Y*: 17.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IOO vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IOO iShares Global 100 ETF	9.16%	27.02%	26.54%	27.71%	-16.34%	26.03%	18.61%	30.01%	-6.22%	23.56%
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund	6.65%	21.76%	36.00%	38.67%	-28.31%	24.52%	32.48%	30.00%	-3.81%	32.18%

Correlation

The correlation between IOO and FCNTX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2000	0.87

The correlation between IOO and FCNTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

IOO vs. FCNTX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IOO	FCNTX
Technology	46.2%	27.0%
Communication Services	11.0%	21.2%
Financial Services	9.1%	13.8%
Consumer Cyclical	8.4%	10.1%
Healthcare	8.4%	9.2%
Consumer Defensive	5.6%	3.7%
Industrials	4.8%	8.6%
Energy	3.6%	3.6%
Basic Materials	1.7%	2.1%
Utilities	0.5%	0.5%
Real Estate	0.2%	0.1%

Return for Risk

IOO vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IOO

IOO Risk / Return Rank: 80
IOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
IOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
IOO Omega Ratio Rank: 80
IOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
IOO Martin Ratio Rank: 83

FCNTX

FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 40
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 39
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IOO vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IOO	FCNTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.28	1.45	+0.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.09	2.01	+1.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.26	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.23	1.86	+1.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.35	7.80	+6.55

IOO vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IOO Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is higher than the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IOO and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IOO vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IOO drawdown since its inception was -55.85%, which is greater than FCNTX's maximum drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IOO and FCNTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	IOO	FCNTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.85%	-49.19%	-6.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.94%	-11.30%	+1.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.19%	-19.75%	+0.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.52%	-32.59%	+9.07%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.43%	-32.59%	+1.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.05%	-2.41%	-1.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.26%	-8.16%	-3.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.24%	2.69%	-0.45%

Volatility

IOO vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) have volatilities of 4.82% and 5.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IOO	FCNTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.82%	5.07%	-0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.31%	11.16%	+0.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.07%	14.53%	-0.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.12%	19.23%	-2.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.80%	19.71%	-1.91%

IOO vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IOO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

IOO vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

IOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than FCNTX's 4.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund	4.38%	5.21%	4.19%	3.78%	11.87%	10.80%	8.01%	4.16%	7.46%	6.08%	3.81%	5.33%
IOO iShares Global 100 ETF	0.84%	0.92%	1.08%	1.49%	2.00%	1.53%	1.49%	2.02%	2.54%	2.23%	2.75%	2.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IOO and FCNTX in my portfolio?

IOO and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IOO or FCNTX?

FCNTX has higher volatility (5.07%) compared to IOO (4.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IOO dropped -55.85% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.