PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IONZ vs. TSLQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IONZ vs. TSLQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Short IONQ ETF (IONZ) and Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IONZ achieves a -86.94% return, which is significantly lower than TSLQ's 17.46% return.


IONZ

1D
11.28%
1M
22.82%
YTD
-86.94%
6M
-84.33%
1Y
-97.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSLQ

1D
0.09%
1M
26.81%
YTD
17.46%
6M
36.29%
1Y
-53.58%
3Y*
-64.42%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IONZ vs. TSLQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
IONZ
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short IONQ ETF
-86.94%-80.36%
TSLQ
Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF
17.46%-55.44%

Correlation

The correlation between IONZ and TSLQ is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IONZ vs. TSLQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IONZ
IONZ Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
IONZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IONZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
IONZ Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
IONZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
IONZ Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

TSLQ
TSLQ Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
TSLQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLQ Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLQ Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IONZ vs. TSLQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short IONQ ETF (IONZ) and Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IONZTSLQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

0.93

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.99

-0.74

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.28

-0.95

-0.33

IONZ vs. TSLQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IONZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.52, which is comparable to the TSLQ Sharpe Ratio of -0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IONZ and TSLQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IONZ vs. TSLQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IONZ drawdown since its inception was -98.66%, roughly equal to the maximum TSLQ drawdown of -98.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IONZ and TSLQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IONZTSLQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.66%

-98.73%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-98.48%

-72.21%

-26.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-97.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.85%

-98.25%

+0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-74.23%

-67.67%

-6.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

78.39%

56.50%

+21.89%

Volatility

IONZ vs. TSLQ - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Daily Target 2X Short IONQ ETF (IONZ) has a higher volatility of 53.81% compared to Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ) at 27.08%. This indicates that IONZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSLQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IONZTSLQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

53.81%

27.08%

+26.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

152.53%

56.64%

+95.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

187.36%

87.75%

+99.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

187.10%

94.23%

+92.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

187.10%

94.23%

+92.87%

IONZ vs. TSLQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IONZ has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLQ's 1.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

IONZ vs. TSLQ - Dividend Comparison

IONZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSLQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.99%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
IONZ
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short IONQ ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TSLQ
Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF
8.99%10.56%4.95%13.35%2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


IONZ and TSLQ have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IONZ has higher volatility (53.81%) compared to TSLQ (27.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IONZ dropped -98.66% vs TSLQ's -98.73%.

On 1-year performance, TSLQ leads with -53.58% vs -97.85% for IONZ. On fees, TSLQ is cheaper at 1.17% per year. On volatility, TSLQ has been the lower-risk option at 27.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSLQ has performed better with a -53.58% return vs -97.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSLQ is cheaper with a 1.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for IONZ.

TSLQ has the higher dividend yield at 8.99%, compared with 0.00% for IONZ.

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Tradr. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for IONZ and 1.17% for TSLQ.

IONZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.52 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IONZ and TSLQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer