PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IONZ vs. FLYD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IONZ vs. FLYD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Short IONQ ETF (IONZ) and MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IONZ achieves a -87.96% return, which is significantly lower than FLYD's -10.89% return.


IONZ

1D
26.98%
1M
-40.91%
YTD
-87.96%
6M
-86.30%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FLYD

1D
2.48%
1M
-1.03%
YTD
-10.89%
6M
-18.12%
1Y
-47.47%
3Y*
-54.07%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IONZ vs. FLYD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IONZ and FLYD is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IONZ vs. FLYD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IONZ

FLYD
FLYD Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
FLYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLYD Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
FLYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLYD Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IONZ vs. FLYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short IONQ ETF (IONZ) and MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IONZ vs. FLYD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IONZFLYDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.52

-0.74

+0.22

Drawdowns

IONZ vs. FLYD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IONZ drawdown since its inception was -98.66%, roughly equal to the maximum FLYD drawdown of -98.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IONZ and FLYD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IONZFLYDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.66%

-98.11%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-93.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.02%

-97.94%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-73.24%

-83.15%

+9.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

37.34%

Volatility

IONZ vs. FLYD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IONZFLYDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

59.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

187.62%

74.52%

+113.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

187.62%

83.64%

+103.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

187.62%

83.64%

+103.98%

IONZ vs. FLYD - Expense Ratio Comparison

IONZ has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FLYD's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

IONZ vs. FLYD - Dividend Comparison

Neither IONZ nor FLYD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IONZ and FLYD have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FLYD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLYD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for IONZ.

IONZ and FLYD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and REX. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for IONZ and 0.95% for FLYD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IONZ and FLYD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer